Page 1 of 13

Archives of Business Research – Vol. 10, No. 5

Publication Date: May 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/abr.105.12350. Baafi, A. J., & Sarkodie, E. E. (2022). The Nexus Between Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing and Risk: A Case of Ghana Stock

Exchange. Archives of Business Research, 10(05). 140-152.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

The Nexus Between Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing and

Risk: A Case of Ghana Stock Exchange

Joseph Antwi Baafi

Lecturer, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills

Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Kumasi, Ghana

Faculty of Business Education, Department of Accounting

Mr. Eric Effah Sarkodie

Senior Lecturer, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills

Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Kumasi, Ghana

Faculty of Business Education, Department of Accounting

INTRODUCTION

In financial capital market trading, individuals who are involved has the ultimate aim of making

gains (Don and Brooks, 2008). The gains could be made in a number of ways, but one obvious

way is through the reduction of risk associated with the trade (Don and Brooks, 2008). An

individual who owns stocks could decide to use options to protect the stock. That is if the

individual decide to build a portfolio of stock and options. According to Chicago Board Option

Exchange Market (CBOC, 2021), percentage of option contract traded between Jan 2021 to June

2021 average about 80 percent of total trade. In 2020, the average daily volumes of option

contracts amount to 20,466,938 (Options Clearing Corporation, 2021).

The options used as protective mechanism against losses are valued or priced. The main models

used in option pricing area Binomial Model (Benninga & Wiener, 1997), Trinomial Option

Pricing model (Rubinstein, 2000), Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing Model (Macbeth and

Merville, 1979), Heston Model (Rouah, 2013), Log-Levy Process (Kleinert and Korbel (2016)

and Double-Fractional Option Pricing Model. The binomial option pricing model is a model

that uses an iterative procedure and allows for nodes specification, during the time span

between the valuation date and option's expiration date. Binomial model allows for two

outcomes. The Trinomial Model however allows for three outcomes. The possible outcomes in

a time period are greater than, the same as and less than the current value. Both binomial and

trinomial pricing model were written in discrete time. The Black-Scholes-Merton model

considers option pricing in continuous time. The Heston Model was developed by Steven

Heston to use to price European Options. This is a type of stochastic volatility (Aloe, 2012).

Among these methods, Black-Scholes-Merton model is widely used by players in derivative

market in pricing an option. This model has been developed in modern times so that there is a

Black-Scholes-Merton calculator used to calculate option prices. This calculator gives an

appropriate value of the price of an option. An appropriate value would also help to protect the

underlying assets on which the option is purchased.

Page 2 of 13

141

Baafi, A. J., & Sarkodie, E. E. (2022). The Nexus Between Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing and Risk: A Case of Ghana Stock Exchange. Archives of

Business Research, 10(05). 140-152.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.105.12350

Derivative market for that matter, option markets has been developed in modern times mostly

in developed countries. Even though history of derivatives market date back to the fourth

century BC (Weber, 2009), the development was quick in the 19th century. However, such rate

of development cannot be seen in developing countries especially Africa. Out of the 32 major

trading options exchange market in the world, only one is found in Africa, which is the South

Africa Futures Exchange. In West Africa, there have been a number of discussions about option

exchange market but certain challenges are not making it possible (Cedric et al, 2013). The

challenges include physical market structure, product quality, standardization and grading

issues, traceability and exchange trading, price transparency and price volatility (Cedric et al,

2013).

Such problems inhibiting the establishment of organized option exchange markets are also very

common in Ghana. The establishment of option market has been postponed because of these

challenges (Whitehouse, 2020). But these challenges do not prevent researchers from

considering investigation of possible option trading activities in Ghana. Again, since risk exist

on every stock exchange trading, it would be important to consider various ways by which risk

could be mitigated. One of the ways could be to develop an option market. Developing an option

market means pricing options or valuation of option on the Ghana stock exchange. As said

before one theory of option pricing Black-Scholes-Merton model.

The main objective of this study is therefore to know how Black-Scholes-Merton model could

be used to help in appropriate option value. Again a risk assessment of stocks on GES would be

done. This would enable us see how Black-Scholes valuation of option would help reduce the

riskiness of an assets. This correct option value could also be used to mitigate risk on Ghana

Stock Exchange.

LITERATURE REVIEW

The roots of Black-Scholes-Merton formula date back to the 19th century (Don and Brooks,

2008). In the 1820s, a Scottish scientist, Robert Brown, observed the motion of pollen

suspended in water and noticed that the movements followed no distinct pattern, moving

randomly, independent of any current in water. This was known as Brownian Motion (Don and

Brooks, 2008). After a series of development by French Mathematician, Louis Bachelier (1900),

a renowned academician Albert Einstein (1900) and a Japanese Mathematician Kiyoshi Ito

(1951), Fischer Black and Myron Scholes used these developments as a basis for pricing assets.

The first approach of pricing assets was Capital Assets Pricing Theory and the other approach

was the use of Stochastic Calculus (Merton and Scholes, 2013). At the same time, Robert Merton

developed option pricing separately but wrote the entire mathematical equation in continuous

time period.

Ever since its inception, a number of empirical studies have been conducted over the years by

researchers. Notable among them are Macbeth and Merville (1979), Lee et al (2005), Song and

Wang (2013), Chesney and Scott (1989) and Duan (1995).

Macbeth and Merville (1979) found that option prices predicted by Black-Scholes model are on

average less (greater) than market prices for in-the-money (out-of-the-money) options. Again,

with the exclusion of out-of-the-money options with less than ninety days to expiration, the

extent to which Black-Scholes model underprices out-of-the-money option increases with the

Page 3 of 13

142

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 5, May-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

extent to which the option is out-of-the-money, and decreases as time to expiration decreases.

Lastly, the prices given by Black-Scholes model with out-of-the-money options which are less

than 90 days to expiration are greater than the market prices. But this method involved lots of

work. Song and Wang (2013), used a modern computational technique known as time- fractional Black-Scholes equation. This technique uses differential equation to the pricing

theory of option and concluded that this method requires less computational work.

Kleinert and Korbel (2016) also improved upon Black-Scholes model and showed that double- fractional differential equation predicted options prices better. Option prices given by double- fractional differential equation provides a more reliable hedge when included in a portfolio of

stocks. However, Yavuz, and Özdemir (2018) also defined a new fractional operator by the use

of iterative method. The fractional Black-Scholes equation was redefined as conformable

fractional Adomian decomposition method (CFADM) and conformable fractional modified

homotopy perturbation method (CFMHPM). The fractional Black-Scholes was solved using

these two methods. It was found that the resulting models were efficient and powerful

techniques in predicting option prices. Kumar et al (2012) had earlier used Laplace homotopy

perturbation method, which is a combined form of Laplace transform and homotopy

perturbation method. This method gave a quick and accurate solution to fractional Black

Scholes equation with boundary condition for a European option pricing problem. Other

researchers such as Jena and Chakraverty (2019), Ghandehari and Ranjbar (2014) and Akrami

and Erjaee (2015) have all used fractional Black Scholes approach in option pricing.

A number of studies have sought to reduce biases in Black-Scholes model notably Mitra (2012)

who sought to combine artificial neural network approach with Black-Scholes. Mitra (2012),

acknowledged that Black and Scholes formula showed certain systematic biases and thus

amongst the non-parametric approaches, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) is found to be more

appropriate. Mitra (2012), conclude that model used in ANN method gave a much superior

results compared to Black-Scholes Model. ANN approaches was able to accounts for difference

in option value by automatically adjusting changes in relation to elements such as volatility.

Contreras et al (2010) also used quantum model and sought to interpret Black-Scholes equation

from the viewpoint of quantum mechanics. Another means of reducing biases in option value

was suggested by Burkovska et al (2015). The main procedures are POD-Greedy and Angle- Greedy procedure for the construction of the primal and dual reduced spaces. Numerical

evidence of reduction in biases were provided to prove real world option price approximation

quality.

Option price valuation has been dominated by literature in developed countries. This is

basically because the development of derivative markets started a long time. The same volume

and amount of literature cannot be said to have been cited using the African context.

Nevertheless, some works still exist. Flint and Maré (2017) considered the price of an option

when an underlying is assumed to display long memory using Black-Scholes model in the

context of South Africa. The results shown that Black-Scholes approach always admits a non- constant implied volatility term structure when the Hurst exponent is not 0.5, and that 1-year

implied volatility is independent of the Hurst exponent and equivalent to fractional volatility.

This means equity index can accurately be modeled and this could be useful in derivatives

trading and delta hedging. In Nigeria, Okaro et al (2018), employed Black-Scholes model in

pricing palm-oil futures. The procedure in determining the value involved creating the model’s

Page 4 of 13

143

Baafi, A. J., & Sarkodie, E. E. (2022). The Nexus Between Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing and Risk: A Case of Ghana Stock Exchange. Archives of

Business Research, 10(05). 140-152.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.105.12350

implied contract prices using historical prices at seasonal peak and/or dip periods for ten years.

These contracts prices were related with assessed unit profit/loss margins of the same

historical periods and correlated with Pearson’s Coefficient. Okaro et al (2018) concluded that

B-S model is appropriate for valuing unstructured over-the-counter seasonal contracts. Other

studies on option pricing that do not necessary used Black-Scholes model include Venter and

Maré (2020), Du Plooy and Venter (2021), Mpapalika (2019), Jordaan and Van Rooyen (2010)

and Holman et al (2011).

In Ghana few works on option pricing especially Black-Scholes exist. Notable study involving

Black-Scholes is Antwi and Oduro (2018). In this study, the authors found that option prices

could be determined using Ghanaian stocks. However when the option have low volatilities and

low initial stock price, the call value is zero in most cases but put prices do not tend to zero

given the same conditions. Another study which is not directly related to Black-Scholes but has

something to do with the derivative market is Obeng-Darko (2019). In all these studies, Black- Scholes determination of option prices did not give a sense of risk reduction on the Ghana Stock

Exchange market. But the essence of options is to help individual reduce risk in a given

portfolio. This study therefore seeks to calculate option prices for companies listed on Ghana

Stock Exchange and determine show such option prices could help individual investors reduce

risk and increase profitability.

Methodology

The binomial option pricing model is derived by forming a hedge portfolio consisting of a long

position in shares and a short position in calls. In a two period model, the relative number of

shares to calls changes so the investor must do some trading to maintain the riskless nature of

transaction (Don and Brooks, 2008). If this is done, the portfolio will earn a risk-free rate if and

only if the option is priced by the formula obtained. If the option trades at any other price, the

law of one price is violated and the investor can earn an arbitrage profit (Merton and Scholes,

2013). In Black-Scholes-Merton model, trading occurs continuously, but the general idea is the

same. A hedge portfolio is established and maintained by constantly adjusting the relative

proportions of stock and options, a process called dynamic trading. The end result is obtained

through complex mathematics. This study follows Hull (2015) derivation of Black-Scholes

formula. Starting from a binomial option pricing model, the payoff from European Call option

is

max(�!�"�#$" − �, 0)

where S0 is initial stock price, d is proportional down movement, u is proportional up

movement, j is an upward movement, n-j is downward movement, X is strike price and T is time.

For binomial distribution, the probability of up and down movement is

�!

(� − �)!�!

�"(1 − �)#$"

The expected payoff for call option is

2 �!

(� − �)!�!

�"(1 − �)#$"

#

"%!

max(�!�"�#$" − �, 0)

Page 5 of 13

144

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 5, May-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Discounting this at a risk-free rate, the option price is

� = �$&' 2 �!

(� − �)!�!

�"(1 − �)#$"

#

"%!

max(�!�"�#$" − �, 0) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . .1

The call value in equation 1 is nonzero when,

�!�"�#$" > � or �� ;

(!

) < > −���(�) − (� − �) ln(�)

Because � = � *'⁄# "

��� � = � *'⁄# #"

�h�� ��������� �������

�� G

�!

�H > ��J�

� − 2��J�

�� � >

2 − ln (�!⁄�)

2�O�⁄�

Therefore equation 1 is

� = �$&' ∑ #!

(#$")!"!

�"(1 − �)#$" "01 (�!�"�#$" − �)

Where

� = �

2 − ln (�!/�)

2�O�/�

For convenience we define

�2 = 2 �!

(� − �)!�!

�"(1 − �)#$"�"�#$"

"01

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .2

�3 = 2 �!

(� − �)!�!

�"(1 − �)#$"

"01

... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 3

So that

� = �$&'(�!�2 − ��3) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . .4

When there is n trials and p is probability of success, probability distribution of the number of

success is approximately normally distributed with mean � and standard deviationO�(1 − �).

For large samples n

�3 = � X � − �

O�(1 − �)

Y ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . .5

Where N = cumulative probability distribution function. Substituting for �, we get

�3 = � [ ln ;

�!

� <

2�√�O�(1 − �)

+

√� ;� − 1

2<

O�(1 − �)

^ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .6

From the equation for p

� = �&'/# − �$5*'/#

�5*'/# − �$5*'/#

By expanding the exponential functions in a series we see that, as n tends to infinity, p(1-p)

tends to 1⁄4 and √� ;� − 2

3

< ����� ��

(� − �3/2)√�

2�

Page 6 of 13

145

Baafi, A. J., & Sarkodie, E. E. (2022). The Nexus Between Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing and Risk: A Case of Ghana Stock Exchange. Archives of

Business Research, 10(05). 140-152.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.105.12350

So that equation 6 becomes

�3 = � [

ln ;

�!

� < + (� − �3/2) �

�√� ^ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 7

And

�2 = 2 �!

(� − �)!�!

(��)"

"01

[(1 − �)�]#$" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 8

Define

�∗ = ��

�� + (1 − �)� ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . . ... ... 9

1 − �∗ = (1 − �)�

�� + (1 − �)�

Thus equation 8 could be written as

�2 = [�� + (1 − �)�)]# 2 �!

(� − �)!�!

(�∗)"(1 − �∗)#$"

"01

Since �&'/# = �� + (1 − �)�,�h��

�2 = �&' 2 �!

(� − �)!�!

(�∗)"(1 − �∗)#$"

"01

This indicates �2 involves a binomial distribution where the probability of an up movement is

p* rather than p. By approximation we get

�2 = �&'� X �∗ − �

O�∗(1 − �∗)

Y

And substituting for � we have

�2 = �&'� X ln (�!/�)

2�√�O�∗(1 − �∗)

+

√�(�∗ − 1/2)

O�∗(1 − �∗)

Y

Substituting for u and d in equation 9 we get

�∗ = e �&'/# − �$5*'/#

�5*'/# − �$5*'/#

f e

�5*'/#

�&'/# f

By expanding the exponential functions and n tends to infinity, p*(1-p*) tend to 1⁄4

and √� ;�∗ − 2

3

< ����� ��

7&85$/39√'

35

with the results that

�2 = �&'� [

ln ;

�!

�< + (� + �3/2)�

�√� ^ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 10

From equations 4, 7 and 10

� = �!�(�2) − ��$&'�(�3) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .11

Where

�2 = ln(�!/�) + (� + �3/2)�

�√�

Page 7 of 13

146

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 5, May-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

�3 = ln(�!/�) + (� + �3/2)�

�√� = �2 − �√�

N(d1), N(d2) = cumulative normal probabilities

� = annualized volatility (standard deviation) of the continuously compounded (log) return on

the stock

r = continuously compounded risk-free rate.

For Put Option where

� (�!, �, �) = �(�!, �, �) − �! + ��$&'

Letting P stand for � (�!, �, �) gives the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model:

� = ��$&'[1 − �(�3)] − �![1 − �(�2)],

Where d1 and d2 are the same as in call option pricing model. Based on the properties of

standard normal distribution, the put option can also be represented as

� = ��$&'�(−�3) − �!�(−�2) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 12

The study thus would use equation 11 and 12 to compute option prices for stocks on Ghana

Stock Exchange.

Data

Date used for the study was from Ghana Stock Exchange January 2020 to December 2020.

Variables used to calculate the possible call and put prices are stock price, strike price, time to

expiration, volatility and risk free interest.

Results and Discussion

In determining the value of Call and Put Options, we shall consider two possible scenarios:

when the option would be in-the-money and out-of-the-money.

Page 8 of 13

147

Baafi, A. J., & Sarkodie, E. E. (2022). The Nexus Between Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing and Risk: A Case of Ghana Stock Exchange. Archives of

Business Research, 10(05). 140-152.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.105.12350

Table 1: Situation the Call Option is in-the-money

Companies Stock

Price

Strike

Price

Time to

Expiration

(Years)

Volatility

Risk Free

Interest

Rate

Call

Price

Put

Price

AngloGold Ashanti 37 30 1 0 0.169 11.66 0.00

Aluworks Limited 0.11 0.8 1 0.005 0.169 0 0.57

Benso Oil Palm

Plantation 2.00 1.4 1 0.329 0.169 0.82 0.00

CalBank PLC 0.69 0.3 1 0.106 0.169 0.44 0.00

Clydestone Ghana

Limited 0.3 0.1 1 0 0.169 0.22 0.00

Camelot Ghana 0.11 0.4 1 0.007 0.169 0 0.23

Cocoa Processing

Company 0.03 0.01 1 0.005 0.169 0.020 0.00

Enterprise Group PLC 1.4 0.8 1 0.117 0.169 0.02 0.14

Ecobank

Transnational

Incorporation

0.08 0.01 1 0.009 0.169 0.07 0.00

Fan Milk Limited 1.08 0.7 1 1.34 0.169 0.49 0.00

Ghana Commercial

Bank Limited 4.05 2.50 1 0.50 0.169 2.00 0.07

Guinness Ghana

Breweries PLC 0.9 0.2 1 0.28 0.169 0.73 0.00

Golden Star

Resources Limited 9.5 7.3 1 0 0.169 3.33 0.00

Produce Buying

Company limited 0.03 0.01 1 0 0.169 0.020 0.00

PZ Cussons Limited 0.38 0.20 1 0 0.169 0.21 0.00

Standard Chartered

Bank Ghana PLC 16.31 12.00 1 1.84 0.169 6.18 0.00

Sam Wood Limited 0.05 0.01 1 0 0.169 0.040 0.00

Total Petroleum

Ghana PLC 2.83 1.9 1 0.28 0.169 1.23 0.01

Unilever Ghana PLC 8.29 5 1 2.39 0.169 4.07 0.00

Ghana Oil Company

Limited 1.5 0.9 1 0.10 0.169 0.74 0.00

Tullow Oil PLC 11.92 9 1 0.007 0.169 4.32 0.00

NewGold Issuer

Limited 105 99 1 12.23 0.169 21.52 0.13

Mega African Capital 5.98 4 1 0 0.169 2.60 0.00

Meridian-Marshalls

Holdings 0.11 0.08 1 0 0.169 0.04 0.00

HORDS Limited 0.1 0.06 1 0 0.169 0.06 0.00

Ecobank Ghana

Limited 7.2 5.0 1 0.84 0.169 2.98 0.00

Agricultural

Development Bank 5.06 3.0 1 0 0.169 2.47 0.00

MTN Ghana 0.64 0.40 1 0.044 0.169 0.30 0.00

Source: Author Calculation, 2021

Page 9 of 13

148

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 5, May-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Table 1 above shows the value of call and put option prices calculated using black-scholes

formular for selected companies listed on GSE. The table assumes a condition where the strike

price is above the stock price. With the exception of Aluworks and Camelot Ghana, the

remaining companies have a positive value of call options. This indicates that if these

companies’ stocks are underlying assets, investor exercising the right to buy a financial

derivative on these stocks would make gains. However, any attempt to sell would result in a

loss. The only move an investor could make to gain on the financial market is to buy a call

option. For Aluworks and Camelot, a move to buy a call option would results in a loss.

The table also shows that with the exception of Aluworks Limited, Camelot Ghana, Ghana

Commercial Bank, Total Petroleum PLC, NewGold Issuer and Enterprise Group PLC, the value

of Put Option for the remaining companies were zero.

A list of companies that would give an investor, the right to either buy or sell under the current

condition of strike price above stock price is Enterprise Group PLC, Ghana Commercial Bank,

Total Petroleum and NewGold Issuer. This invariably makes trading financial derivatives on the

stock market one-sided. For derivatives market to survive there should be investor on both

sides of the exchange. This raises huge questions on GSE to entertain derivatives market

activities. This one-sided trade could be due to low volatility on the Ghanaian market. Figure 1

shows a pictorial graph of volatility against call option value. The figure shows that volatility

for most part was low and stable. A higher spike seen quickly reverted to the low levels

previously observed. For certain parts of the diagram, volatility was almost zero.

Figure 1: Call Option value against Volatility

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 0.106 0.005 1.34 0 1.84 2.39 12.23 0 0.044

Call Price

Volatility

Page 10 of 13

149

Baafi, A. J., & Sarkodie, E. E. (2022). The Nexus Between Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing and Risk: A Case of Ghana Stock Exchange. Archives of

Business Research, 10(05). 140-152.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.105.12350

Table 2: Situation the Call Option is out-of the-money

Companies Stock

Price

Strike

Price

Time to

Expiration

(Years)

Volatility Risk Free

Interest

Rate

Call

Price

Put

Price

AngloGold Ashanti 37 44 1 0 0.169 0.00 0.16

Aluworks Limited 0.11 0.19 1 0.005 0.169 0.00 0.5

Benso Oil Palm

Plantation

2.00 2.6 1 0.329 0.169 0.00 0.2

CalBank PLC 0.69 0.90 1 0.106 0.169 0.00 0.07

Clydestone Ghana

Limited

0.3 0.6 1 0 0.169 0.00 0.21

Camelot Ghana 0.11 0.17 1 0.007 0.169 0.00 0.03

Cocoa Processing

Company

0.03 0.05 1 0.005 0.169 0.00 0.01

Enterprise Group

PLC

1.4 1.8 1 0.117 0.169 0.28 0.00

Ecobank

Transnational

Incorporation

0.08 0.13 1 0.009 0.169 0.00 0.03

Fan Milk Limited 1.08 1.65 1 1.34 0.169 0.00 0.32

Ghana Commercial

Bank Limited

4.05 5.26 1 0.50 0.169 0.66 1.05

Guinness Ghana

Breweries PLC

0.9 1.4 1 0.28 0.169 0.03 0.31

Golden Star

Resources Limited

9.5 11.2 1 0 0.169 0.04 0.00

Produce Buying

Company limited

0.03 0.07 1 0 0.169 0.00 0.03

PZ Cussons Limited 0.38 0.61 1 0 0.169 0.00 0.14

Standard Chartered

Bank Ghana PLC

16.31 20.51 1 1.84 0.169 0.77 1.78

Sam Wood Limited 0.05 0.04 1 0 0.169 0.02

Total Petroleum

Ghana PLC

2.83 3.21 1 0.28 0.169 0.37 0.25

Unilever Ghana PLC 8.29 10.68 1 2.39 0.169 0.51 1.24

Ghana Oil Company

Limited

1.5 3.41 1 0.10 0.169 0.00 1.38

Tullow Oil PLC 11.92 14 1 0.007 0.169 0.08 0.00

NewGold Issuer

Limited

105 129 1 12.23 0.169 3.48 7.42

Mega African Capital 5.98 7.56 1 0 0.169 0.00 0.40

Meridian-Marshalls

Holdings

0.11 0.20 1 0 0.169 0.00 0.16

HORDS Limited 0.1 0.9 1 0 0.169 0.00 0.66

Ecobank Ghana

Limited

7.2 8.47 1 0.84 0.169 0.27 0.22

Agricultural

Development Bank

5.06 8.94 1 0 0.169 0.00 2.49

MTN Ghana 0.64 0.98 1 0.044 0.169 0.00 0.19

Source: Authors Calculation, 2021

Page 11 of 13

150

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 5, May-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Table 2 above shows the condition where the strike price is below the stock price. The value of

Put Option showed a positive side for all listed stocks with the exception of Enterprise Group

PLC, Golden Star Resources Limited and Tullow Oil PLC where the value is zero.

The price of call option for 18 out of 28 listed stocks showed a value of zero. Ten (10) listed

stocks showed a positive call value. The table also showed that seven (7) companies namely

Ghana Commercial Bank, Guinness Ghana Breweries PLC, Standard Chartered Bank Ghana PLC,

Total Petroleum Ghana PLC, Unilever Ghana PLC, NewGold Issuer Limited and Ecobank Ghana

have a value for both call and put options. This means stocks of 21 companies cannot be an

underlying asset for trading financial derivatives because it will only be a one sided trade under

the current condition. The reason for this one sided trade phenomena can be attributed to low

volatility on the stock market. Figure 2 shows volatility rate against Put option value. The point

of low volatility is also shown with some part almost equal zero. As seen previously, a higher

spike in volatility quickly reverted to its lower position again.

Figure 2: Put Option Value against Volatility

Taking the two conditions of stock price above strike price and strike price above stock price

together, three companies namely Ghana Commercial Bank, Total Petroleum Ghana and

NewGold Issuer Limited can be underlying assets for trading financial derivatives on the stock

market.

Volatility on GSE

The issue of low volatility has come up strongly in previous discussion of the value of Options.

To this end, the authors decided to consider the concept. Figure 3 shows a line graph of volatility

rate of stocks on GES. The figure shows that the volatility rate is almost close to zero. The

calculated volatility rate for listed companies is 2.3. If an outline of 12.23 is dropped from the

data, the volatility rate is 0.6. A radar graph is also shown in figure 4 for a much clearly view

Figure 3: Volatility Rate of stocks on GES

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0

0.005

0.329

0.106

0

0.007

0.005

0.117

0.009

1.34

0.5

0.28

0

0

0

1.84

0

0.28

2.39

0.1

0.007

12.23

0

0

0

0.84

0

0.044

Put Option Value

Volatility

Page 12 of 13

151

Baafi, A. J., & Sarkodie, E. E. (2022). The Nexus Between Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing and Risk: A Case of Ghana Stock Exchange. Archives of

Business Research, 10(05). 140-152.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.105.12350

Figure 4: Radar Graph of Volatility

Source: Authors Construct, 2021

A comparison of the Ghanaian rate with other rate elsewhere reveals a sharp difference. The

table below shows a sample of stock market and volatility around the world. Table 3 shows that

the highest volatility was 42 from US: S&P and lowest was 18.80 from Asia Dow. The average

volatility for these 8 listed sample markets was 26.68. This is at complete variance from

situation of GSE.

Table 3: Stock Markets and Volatility for sample market

Market Volatility

Asia Dow 18.80

Australia S&P 23.18

Japan: Nikkei 225 26.95

Singapore: Straits Times 22.85

US: Dow Jones 28

US: S&P 42

New York Stock Exchange 32.02

Chicago Board Option Exchange 19.66

Source: Wall Street Journal, 2021

-5

0

5

10

15

0

0.005

0.329

0.106

0

0.007

0.005

0.117

0.009

1.34

0.5

0.28

0

0

0

1.84

0

0.28

2.39

0.1

0.007

12.23

0

0

0

0.84

0

0.044

Volatility

Page 13 of 13

152

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 10, Issue 5, May-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

It could be realized that for there to be two-sided and possible gains from trading a financial

derivative, volatility should be high in other to increase the riskiness of an underlying assets

and thus make gains. The lower the volatility, the lower the riskiness and the higher the

volatility, the higher the riskiness. Since Ghana Stock Exchange has lower volatility, traders

should worry less about riskiness. This is because almost zero volatility would lead to a gain

which is risk free.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

This study set out to use Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to calculate appropriate

option value for companies listed on the GES and to undertake an assessment of the riskiness

of stocks. The study found that with the exception of Aluworks and Camelot Ghana, the

remaining companies have a positive value of call options. A list of companies that would give

an investor, the right to either buy or sell under the current condition of strike price above stock

price is Enterprise Group PLC, Ghana Commercial Bank, Total Petroleum and NewGold Issuer.

This invariably makes trading financial derivatives on the stock market one-sided. This raises

huge questions on GSE to entertain derivatives market activities. This one-sided trade could be

due to low volatility on the Ghanaian market. The results also found that the price of call option

for 18 out of 28 listed stocks showed a value of zero. Ten (10) listed stocks showed a positive

call value. The table also showed that seven (7) companies namely Ghana Commercial Bank,

Guinness Ghana Breweries PLC, Standard Chartered Bank Ghana PLC, Total Petroleum Ghana

PLC, Unilever Ghana PLC, NewGold Issuer Limited and Ecobank Ghana have a value for both call

and put options. The above indicates that Ghana Stock Exchange market is not ready for option

pricing and financial derivatives activities in general.