Page 1 of 14

Archives of Business Research – Vol. 12, No. 6

Publication Date: June 25, 2024

DOI:10.14738/abr.126.17176.

Bezerra, L. T. do S., Santos, Z. C., de Oliveira, M. A. C. M., Moreira, A. L. S., Junior, P. M. G., Oliveira, J. M. A. M., Domingues, M. A.

de O., do Carvalho, F. F., Medeiros, E. C., Lyra, M. R. C. C., & do Nascimento, R. M. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of ESG Strategies

and Their Impact on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Automotive Industry: A Case Study of Renault and Volkswagen.

Archives of Business Research, 12(6). 69-82.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Analysis and Comparison of ESG Strategies and Their Impact on

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the Automotive

Industry: A Case Study of Renault and Volkswagen

Luiz Thiago do Sacramento Bezerra

Instituto Federal de Pernambuco – IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil

Zildomar Carvalho Santos

Instituto Federal de Pernambuco – IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil

Manoel Alcides Caminha Mendes de Oliveira

Instituto Federal de Pernambuco – IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil

Anderson Luiz Souza Moreira

Instituto Federal de Pernambuco – IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil

Paulo Maurício Gonçalves Junior

Instituto Federal de Pernambuco – IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil

José Mário Alexandre Melo Oliveira

Instituto Federal de Pernambuco – IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil

Marco Antônio de Oliveira Domingues

Instituto Federal de Pernambuco – IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil

Fernando Ferreira do Carvalho

Cesar School, Recife, PE, Brasil

Erika Carlos Medeiros

Universidade de Pernambuco, Caruaru, PE, Brazil

Marília Regina Costa Castro Lyra

Instituto Federal de Pernambuco – IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil

Rogéria Mendes do Nascimento

Instituto Federal de Pernambuco – IFPE, Recife, PE, Brazil

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes and compares the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)

strategies adopted by Renault and Volkswagen, focusing on how these practices are

integrated into their global operations and their impact on the Sustainable

Development Goals (SDGs). Renault and Volkswagen demonstrate significant

C:\Users\PMLS\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.MSO\37D5C8FE.tmp

Page 2 of 14

70

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 12, Issue 6, June-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

commitments to reducing CO2 emissions and promoting sustainable practices.

Renault focuses on expanding its electric vehicle lineup and improving energy

efficiency, while Volkswagen emphasizes the goal of 100% renewable energy usage

by 2025. Social initiatives include Renault's diversity and inclusion programs and

Volkswagen's community development efforts. Both companies maintain strong

governance systems to ensure transparency and ethics, aligning with various SDGs.

This analysis highlights the different approaches each automaker takes towards

achieving sustainability goals, reflecting their specific priorities and contexts

within the automotive industry.

Keywords: Sustainability, Automotive Industry, ESG Strategies, Sustainable Development

Goals.

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, sustainability has emerged as a strategic priority on corporate agendas

worldwide, significantly influencing the automotive industry. Manufacturers such as Renault

and Volkswagen have intensified their initiatives to incorporate sustainable practices that meet

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria. This focus reflects not only a response to

increasing regulatory pressures and consumer expectations but also a commitment to

innovation and socio-environmental responsibility [1] [2].

The relevance of ESG to the automotive industry is amplified by its ability to drive business

practices that mitigate adverse environmental impacts and promote ethical and transparent

corporate governance. With technological advancements and growing pressure to reduce

carbon emissions, automakers are compelled to rethink their production processes and adopt

new sustainable technologies. Leading companies such as Renault and Volkswagen have

pioneered the implementation of strategies that align their business objectives with

sustainability principles, demonstrating that responsible practices can coexist with economic

growth and technological innovation [3] [4].

The integration of ESG principles into automakers' operations is a direct response to changing

stakeholder expectations, demanding greater transparency and accountability in corporate

practices. This shift is evidenced by the increasing number of consumers and investors who

prefer companies with strong sustainability credentials. Volkswagen and Renault, for example,

have invested in electric vehicle technologies and improvements in the energy efficiency of

their factories as part of their ESG commitments. Such initiatives not only reduce environmental

impact but also strengthen brand image and enhance their competitiveness in the global market

[5] [6].

Furthermore, social responsibility, another crucial pillar of ESG, has led these companies to

invest in programs that benefit local communities, promote diversity and inclusion, and ensure

safe and fair working conditions. This reflects an understanding that sustainable corporate

success transcends financial performance to include positive social impacts (Barbieri, 2020).

ESG practices directly impact the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),

aligning corporate actions with global sustainability targets [7].

Page 3 of 14

71

Bezerra, L. T. do S., Santos, Z. C., de Oliveira, M. A. C. M., Moreira, A. L. S., Junior, P. M. G., Oliveira, J. M. A. M., Domingues, M. A. de O., do Carvalho,

F. F., Medeiros, E. C., Lyra, M. R. C. C., & do Nascimento, R. M. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of ESG Strategies and Their Impact on Sustainable

Development Goals (SDGs) in the Automotive Industry: A Case Study of Renault and Volkswagen. Archives of Business Research, 12(6). 69-82.

URL: http://doi.org/10.14738/abr.126.17176

General Objective

This article aims to analyze and compare the ESG strategies adopted by Renault and

Volkswagen, highlighting how these practices are integrated into their global operations and

how these actions impact the SDGs. Through this comparative analysis, the objective is to

understand the nuances and challenges faced by these automakers, as well as to assess the

effectiveness of their sustainability initiatives. Additionally, the study examines how the ESG

practices of these companies contribute to achieving the SDGs.

The structure of the paper includes a theoretical review of the concepts of ESG and SDGs, the

methodology for analyzing the companies' practices, a discussion of the results obtained, and

finally, concluding remarks that highlight the main findings, limitations of the study, and

recommendations for future research.

THEORETICAL REVIEW

The theoretical review of this study explores the concepts of ESG and the SDGs, and how these

concepts are applied in the automotive industry. The increasing relevance of ESG criteria

reflects the pressure for more sustainable and socially responsible business practices, while the

SDGs provide a global framework to guide and evaluate sustainability initiatives. The

combination of these two concepts is crucial for understanding how automakers Renault and

Volkswagen are integrating sustainability into their operations and contributing to global SDGs.

Environmental, Social, and Governance

The concept of ESG refers to a set of criteria used to measure the sustainability and social impact

of a company's operations. These criteria have become increasingly relevant for investors,

consumers, and regulators who seek to ensure that companies adopt responsible and

sustainable practices. The three dimensions of ESG are:

• Environmental: This dimension encompasses practices that reduce the environmental

impact of business operations. It includes carbon emission management, energy

efficiency, sustainable use of natural resources, and the implementation of eco-friendly

technologies. Effective environmental management not only contributes to

environmental preservation but can also result in significant cost savings and

technological innovation [8];

• Social: Involves practices that positively affect employees, local communities, and other

stakeholders. This includes promoting diversity and inclusion, ensuring safe and healthy

working conditions, community development, and respecting human rights. Strong

social practices can improve employee morale, increase customer loyalty, and enhance

the company’s reputation [9];

• Governance: Refers to management practices that ensure transparency, accountability,

and ethics in corporate operations. It includes the structure of the board of directors,

compliance policies, business ethics, and relations with stakeholders. Strong governance

is essential to prevent fraud, ensure regulatory compliance, and foster investor

confidence [2].

Environmental, Social, and Governance

The SDGs were established by the United Nations (UN) as part of the 2030 Agenda, aiming to

promote peace, justice, and global prosperity while protecting the planet. The SDGs encompass

Page 4 of 14

72

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 12, Issue 6, June-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

a wide range of social, economic, and environmental issues and are often used as a framework

to guide and evaluate companies' sustainability practices [1].

Integrating the SDGs into corporate ESG strategies is essential to ensure that business actions

contribute to global sustainable development. Among the 17 SDGs, some are particularly

relevant to the automotive industry, including [10]:

• SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being): The automotive industry can contribute to this

goal by developing safer vehicles, reducing traffic accidents, and improving air quality;

• SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy): Promoting the use of sustainable and affordable

energy, especially with the increased production of electric vehicles and energy

efficiency in factories;

• SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth): Ensuring fair working conditions and

promoting sustainable economic growth by enhancing corporate social responsibility;

• SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure): The automotive industry can lead

technological innovations and sustainable industrial processes;

• SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities): Developing sustainable

transportation systems, such as electric and autonomous vehicles, which reduce urban

pollution and improve mobility.

• SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production): Implementing sustainable

production practices and promoting the recycling and reuse of automotive materials;

• SDG 13 (Climate Action): Reducing carbon emissions and mitigating the effects of

climate change, as the automotive industry is one of the largest contributors to global

greenhouse gas emissions;

• SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals): The automotive industry can form partnerships

to promote sustainability across the value chain and collaborate with governments and

other stakeholders to achieve the SDGs.

These SDGs are all highly relevant to the automotive industry and provide a framework for

evaluating and guiding sustainability initiatives within the sector.

ESG and SDGs in the Automotive Industry

The adoption of ESG practices in the automotive industry has shown significant impacts on

company operations and reputations.

Environmental initiatives such as the development of electric and hybrid vehicles, reduction

of carbon emissions, and sustainable sourcing of materials have not only decreased the

environmental footprint of automotive companies but also aligned them with global efforts to

combat climate change [11]. According to KPMG [11], companies investing in green

technologies and sustainable practices achieve better environmental performance and

regulatory compliance, enhancing their market positioning and brand image.

Social practices including fair labor policies, diversity and inclusion initiatives, and community

engagement have improved employee satisfaction and retention, fostering a positive workplace

culture. Studies by Deloitte [12] indicate that companies implementing comprehensive

diversity programs and engaging in community development projects benefit from increased

Page 5 of 14

73

Bezerra, L. T. do S., Santos, Z. C., de Oliveira, M. A. C. M., Moreira, A. L. S., Junior, P. M. G., Oliveira, J. M. A. M., Domingues, M. A. de O., do Carvalho,

F. F., Medeiros, E. C., Lyra, M. R. C. C., & do Nascimento, R. M. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of ESG Strategies and Their Impact on Sustainable

Development Goals (SDGs) in the Automotive Industry: A Case Study of Renault and Volkswagen. Archives of Business Research, 12(6). 69-82.

URL: http://doi.org/10.14738/abr.126.17176

employee morale and customer loyalty, ultimately contributing to better business

performance.

Governance practices that ensure transparency, ethical behavior, and accountability have

strengthened investor confidence and reduced risks associated with corporate scandals.

Research by McKinsey & Company [13] highlights that robust governance frameworks

emphasizing ethical conduct, compliance, and stakeholder engagement lead to higher

corporate governance ratings and increased investor trust.

Overall, the integration of ESG principles into the core strategies of automotive companies not

only addresses regulatory and societal pressures but also creates long-term value by fostering

innovation, building trust, and ensuring sustainable growth [14].

METHODOLOGY

This study adopts a qualitative and comparative approach to explore how automakers Renault

and Volkswagen integrate ESG practices into their operations. The focus is on identifying,

analyzing, and comparing the specific sustainability strategies reported in their corporate

publications. The choice of this methodology is due to the complex and multidimensional

nature of ESG practices, which involve social, environmental, and governance aspects that are

best explored through detailed qualitative analysis.

Data Source

The main data for this study were collected from the annual sustainability reports published by

the companies, available on their official websites:

• Volkswagen Financial Services Brasil Sustainability Report 2022 [5]

• Renault do Brasil Sustainability Report 2022 [6]

These documents were chosen as primary sources providing authentic data on the companies'

sustainability policies, practices, and outcomes.

Data Collection Method

Data collection was conducted following the steps described below:

1. Download of Sustainability Reports: Access the automakers' official websites to

download the 2022 sustainability reports;

2. Documentary Review: Detailed reading of the reports to extract information related to

sustainability and ESG practices;

3. Data Organization: Categorization of data into ESG categories to facilitate comparative

analysis.

Data Analysis

The data analysis was conducted using the following techniques:

Content Analysis:

Content analysis was employed to investigate the sustainability reports of Renault and

Volkswagen in a systematic qualitative approach, focusing on identifying and coding recurring

themes related to ESG practices. This process was structured into several stages to ensure a

Page 6 of 14

74

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 12, Issue 6, June-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

comprehensive understanding of the information contained in the documents. Initially, a

detailed reading of the reports was performed to familiarize with the content and identify key

topics related to ESG. Based on this preliminary reading, specific thematic categories such as

"environmental management," "social responsibility," and "corporate governance" were

developed, serving as the basis for subsequent data coding. Utilizing open coding method, all

relevant excerpts from the reports that aligned with the predefined categories were marked

and organized. This coding phase allowed for data aggregation to facilitate the identification of

common themes and emerging patterns.

Following coding, a qualitative analysis was conducted to explore the frequency and depth with

which each theme was addressed in the reports. This involved quantifying the frequency of

themes to determine which aspects of ESG received more attention from the automakers, as

well as qualitatively assessing how these themes were addressed in terms of depth of

discussion and integration into the companies' sustainability strategies. This content analysis

method followed guidelines as described by Krippendorff [8] and Neuendorf [9], which provide

detailed instructions on conducting systematic and interpretive content analysis across various

types of communications.

Thematic Comparison:

After coding and analyzing ESG themes in the sustainability reports of Renault and Volkswagen,

a thematic comparison was conducted. This step aimed to highlight both similarities and

differences in the sustainability approaches adopted by the two automakers. Using a

comparative matrix, identified themes were aligned side by side to facilitate visualization of

common patterns and specific variations between the companies. Each ESG category was

analyzed:

• Environmental: Examination of how each company addresses emissions management,

energy efficiency, use of sustainable materials, and innovation in eco-friendly products.

• Social: Analysis of diversity and inclusion policies, community programs, and employee

welfare practices.

• Governance: Comparison of governance structures, transparency in communications,

and stakeholder engagement.

Significant differences, such as variations in the intensity with which practices are reported or

clarity of sustainability goals, were noted. Similarities were used to highlight industry trends or

standard ESG practices adopted by major automakers.

Contextual Interpretation:

Contextual interpretation involved integrating the results of the report analysis into the

broader context of the automotive industry and global sustainability standards. This phase was

crucial for evaluating the effectiveness and real impact of the sustainability practices reported

by the automakers. The analysis considered issues such as the alignment of ESG practices with

the goals of the Paris Agreement and United Nations (UN) SDGs, and emerging environmental

regulations affecting the automotive industry.

This dive into thematic comparison and contextual interpretation provides a detailed, and

contextually relevant analysis of the ESG strategies implemented by Renault and Volkswagen,

Page 7 of 14

75

Bezerra, L. T. do S., Santos, Z. C., de Oliveira, M. A. C. M., Moreira, A. L. S., Junior, P. M. G., Oliveira, J. M. A. M., Domingues, M. A. de O., do Carvalho,

F. F., Medeiros, E. C., Lyra, M. R. C. C., & do Nascimento, R. M. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of ESG Strategies and Their Impact on Sustainable

Development Goals (SDGs) in the Automotive Industry: A Case Study of Renault and Volkswagen. Archives of Business Research, 12(6). 69-82.

URL: http://doi.org/10.14738/abr.126.17176

enabling understanding of the dynamics and effectiveness of sustainability practices in the

automotive industry.

Evaluation Criteria

ESG evaluation criteria were based on specific criteria:

• Alignment with Global Objectives: Assessing how companies' practices align with the UN

SDGs;

• Reported Impact: Analyzing the environmental, social, and governance impacts

reported by companies, considering both positive outcomes and challenges and

limitations;

• Innovation and Engagement: Examining the degree of innovation in ESG practices and

engagement with stakeholders, including consumers, local communities, and investors.

Ethical Considerations

This study adhered to ethical principles, ensuring that all information collected from public

reports is used responsibly and cited appropriately. The analyses and conclusions will be

strictly based on the collected data, maintaining an objective and impartial perspective.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

In this section, the results of the analysis of the sustainability reports of the automakers Renault

and Volkswagen are presented, focusing on ESG practices. The analysis allowed us to

understand how these companies are integrating sustainability principles into their operations

and the impacts of these practices in terms of environmental, social, and governance aspects.

Furthermore, this section discusses the linkage of these practices with the UN's SDGs,

highlighting the strategies adopted by the automakers to meet these global targets. The

identified challenges and opportunities are also addressed, providing a comprehensive view of

the sustainability dynamics in the automotive industry.

Renault do Brasil states that by publishing the Annual Sustainability Report for the 13th

consecutive year, the company reinforces its commitment to cultivating a transparent and

positive relationship with all stakeholders. The ESG aspects addressed report the

organization's performance concerning environmental, social, and governance topics covering

the period from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022 [6].

Similarly, Volkswagen do Brasil states that by publishing the 11th edition of the Sustainability

Yearbook, the ESG aspects and their performance portray the company from January 1 to

December 31, 2022. Occasionally, the document highlights facts from the first quarter of 2023,

as they are tied to the previous cycle [5].

The methodology used by both companies for documenting records in their annual reports

follows the GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) Standards [15], which is a global reference for

sustainability reports. Based on the data, there was a synergy between the main subjects

mapped by the companies, considered as sensitive topics of social, environmental, and

economic impacts from the perspective of the companies and stakeholders.

Page 8 of 14

76

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 12, Issue 6, June-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Figure 1: Evolution of CO2 Emissions – Volkswagen

Figure 1 illustrates the evolution of CO2 emissions for Volkswagen of Brazil from 2020 to 2022.

The graph shows a clear downward trend in both Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions over the three- year period. Specifically, Scope 1 emissions, which include direct emissions from owned or

controlled sources, decreased from 1,000 tons in 2020 to 900 tons in 2022. Similarly, Scope 2

emissions, which cover indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, heat,

or steam, reduced from 2,000 tons in 2020 to 1,800 tons in 2022. This reduction reflects

Volkswagen Financial Services Brazil's efforts to enhance energy efficiency and transition

towards more sustainable energy sources, aligning with their commitment to environmental

sustainability and carbon neutrality goals.

Figure 2 illustrates the direct greenhouse gas emissions (Scope 1) from Renault from 2017 to

2022. The graph shows the emissions from various sources, including electricity, heat or steam

generation, other combustion processes, transport of materials, products, waste, employees

and passengers, and fugitive emissions. The total Scope 1 emissions have fluctuated over the

years, starting at 25,965 tons of CO2 in 2017 and reaching 23,790 tons of CO2 in 2022. Notably,

emissions from electricity, heat or steam generation constitute the largest share of total

emissions each year, although there is a visible reduction from 20,716 tons in 2019 to 16,792

tons in 2020, before increasing again to 20,095 tons in 2022. Emissions from other combustion

processes, transport, and fugitive emissions show minor variations over the years. This data

reflects Renault's ongoing efforts to manage and reduce its direct CO2 emissions, despite some

fluctuations.

Page 9 of 14

77

Bezerra, L. T. do S., Santos, Z. C., de Oliveira, M. A. C. M., Moreira, A. L. S., Junior, P. M. G., Oliveira, J. M. A. M., Domingues, M. A. de O., do Carvalho,

F. F., Medeiros, E. C., Lyra, M. R. C. C., & do Nascimento, R. M. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of ESG Strategies and Their Impact on Sustainable

Development Goals (SDGs) in the Automotive Industry: A Case Study of Renault and Volkswagen. Archives of Business Research, 12(6). 69-82.

URL: http://doi.org/10.14738/abr.126.17176

Figure 2: Direct Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 1) – Renault

Both automakers demonstrate a strong commitment to reducing environmental impacts.

Volkswagen and Renault highlighted the reduction of CO2 emissions in its operations and

products, illustrated in Figure 1 and Figure 2, aligning its goals with the Paris Agreement to

combat climate change (SDG 13).

Figure 3: Progress in Renewable Energy Usage - Volkswagen

Figure 3 illustrates the progress of Volkswagen Financial Services Brazil towards achieving

100% renewable energy usage by 2025. The graph shows a steady increase in the proportion

of renewable energy from 10% in 2020 to a projected 100% by 2025. This reflects the

company's commitment to optimizing energy consumption and transitioning away from fossil

fuels. Implementing various programs and initiatives, Volkswagen Financial Services Brazil

aims to significantly reduce its carbon footprint and contribute to sustainable environmental

practices.

Page 10 of 14

78

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 12, Issue 6, June-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Figure 4: Waste Management – Renault

Figure 4 illustrates the waste management practices of Renault, highlighting the quantities of

various materials recycled in 2022. The chart shows that the largest amount of recycled

material was Paint Sludge, with 470.74 tons, followed by Emulsion Disposal at 407.00 tons and

General Packaging at 198.46 tons. Other significant categories include Construction Debris

(94.79 tons), Plastic Cups (51.05 tons), and Batteries (60.06 tons). Smaller quantities were

observed for Phosphate Sludge (17.60 tons), Styrofoam (17.83 tons), and Lamps (40.34 tons).

These figures underscore Renault's commitment to sustainable waste management practices,

focusing on recycling and reusing materials to minimize environmental impact.

Volkswagen's report [5] mentions that the company intends to be carbon neutral by 2030,

covering scopes 1, 2, and 3 of emissions[16]. Renault focused on increasing energy efficiency

and expanding its electric vehicle lineup, such as the Kwid E-Tech model, directly reflecting on

SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and 13 (Climate Action).

In the social aspect, Renault highlighted initiatives to improve diversity and inclusion within

the company, contributing to SDGs 5 (Gender Equality) and 8 (Decent Work and Economic

Growth). These initiatives include specific programs to increase female representation in

leadership positions and actions to promote pay equity. Volkswagen highlighted community

development and education programs aimed at improving the quality of life in the communities

where the company operates, aligning with SDGs 4 (Quality Education), 5 (Gender Equality), 8

(Decent Work and Economic Growth), and 10 (Reduced Inequalities).

In terms of governance, both companies emphasized the importance of transparency and

business ethics. Renault described its approach to ensuring integrity in all operations,

implementing robust compliance and internal audit systems. Volkswagen detailed its

compliance and ethics system, strengthening SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions).

The governance structures of these companies are exemplary, with dedicated committees to

continuously and integratively review and implement ESG practices.

Additionally, the comparative analysis revealed that while both companies are aligned with the

SDGs, Renault has a stronger focus on energy efficiency initiatives and the expansion of electric

vehicles, whereas Volkswagen is more focused on community development and education

Page 11 of 14

79

Bezerra, L. T. do S., Santos, Z. C., de Oliveira, M. A. C. M., Moreira, A. L. S., Junior, P. M. G., Oliveira, J. M. A. M., Domingues, M. A. de O., do Carvalho,

F. F., Medeiros, E. C., Lyra, M. R. C. C., & do Nascimento, R. M. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of ESG Strategies and Their Impact on Sustainable

Development Goals (SDGs) in the Automotive Industry: A Case Study of Renault and Volkswagen. Archives of Business Research, 12(6). 69-82.

URL: http://doi.org/10.14738/abr.126.17176

programs. This demonstrates how ESG strategies can vary significantly even among companies

in the same sector, reflecting their specific priorities and contexts.

Figure 5 provides a comparative analysis of the ESG strategies adopted by Renault and

Volkswagen based on their 2022 sustainability reports. The percentages depicted in the graph

represent the relative emphasis each company places on these three categories, reflecting the

breadth and depth of their initiatives.

Renault demonstrates a slightly higher focus on environmental practices compared to

Volkswagen, as indicated by the higher percentage. This is largely attributed to Renault's

aggressive efforts in reducing CO2 emissions, particularly through its electric vehicle lineup and

initiatives aimed at energy efficiency. Renault's extensive waste management program, which

includes significant recycling efforts of materials such as paint sludge and emulsion disposal,

also underscores its commitment to environmental sustainability. In contrast, Volkswagen

shows a strong commitment to environmental sustainability with its ambitious goal to achieve

100% renewable energy usage by 2025 and its notable reduction in CO2 emissions over the

past few years. This alignment with the Paris Agreement and the SDG 13 (Climate Action) is

evident in their substantial investments in clean energy and emission reduction technologies.

Figure 5: Comparison of ESG Strategies

Volkswagen surpasses Renault in social initiatives, reflecting a broader range of community and

employee-focused programs. Volkswagen's significant investment in community development

and education programs is aimed at improving the quality of life and education in the regions

where they operate, aligning with SDGs 4 (Quality Education), 8 (Decent Work and Economic

Growth), and 10 (Reduced Inequalities). Renault, while also committed to social responsibility,

places a strong emphasis on diversity and inclusion within the workplace, particularly in

increasing female representation in leadership roles and promoting pay equity, which supports

SDGs 5 (Gender Equality) and 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth).

Both companies exhibit a robust commitment to governance, with an equal emphasis on

transparency, compliance, and ethical business practices. Renault's governance strategy

includes comprehensive compliance and internal audit systems designed to ensure integrity

Page 12 of 14

80

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 12, Issue 6, June-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

and accountability across all operations. Similarly, Volkswagen's detailed compliance and ethics

system strengthens SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), showcasing their

dedication to maintaining high standards of corporate governance. The governance structures

of both companies feature dedicated committees that continuously review and enhance their

ESG practices, demonstrating a clear commitment to ethical conduct and stakeholder

engagement.

This comparative analysis highlights how Renault and Volkswagen, while operating in the same

industry, adopt distinct approaches to integrating ESG principles into their business strategies.

Renault's focus is more inclined towards environmental sustainability and internal social

equity, whereas Volkswagen places significant emphasis on broader social impact and

community engagement. Together, these strategies illustrate the diverse pathways automotive

companies can take to contribute to global sustainability goals.

Table 1 summarizes the main impacts of the ESG practices of the automakers Renault and

Volkswagen concerning the SDGs. Through these initiatives, the companies demonstrate a

varied commitment to sustainability, addressing different aspects of the SDGs according to their

strategies and priorities.

Table 1: Impact of ESG Practices on the SDGs

ODS CATEGORIA RENAULT VOLKSWAGEN

ODS 4 SOCIAL - Education and quality

ODS 5 SOCIAL Diversity and inclusion Women in leadership

ODS 7 ENVIRONMENTAL Energy efficiency and electric vehicles Renewable energy

ODS 8 SOCIAL Decent work Community development

ODS 10 SOCIAL - Reducing inequalities

ODS 13 ENVIRONMENTAL Emission reduction Emission reduction

Use of renewable energy

ODS 16 GOVERNANCE Transparency and ethics Compliance and ethics

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of the sustainability reports of Renault and Volkswagen highlights the significant

efforts both automakers are making to integrate ESG practices into their operations. Renault

has shown a strong commitment to energy efficiency and the expansion of its electric vehicle

lineup, reflecting its alignment with SDGs 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and 13 (Climate

Action). In addition, Renault's initiatives to improve diversity and inclusion within the company

contribute to SDGs 5 (Gender Equality) and 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth). On the

other hand, Volkswagen has demonstrated a clear focus on community development and

education programs, aligning with SDGs 4 (Quality Education), 5 (Gender Equality), 8 (Decent

Work and Economic Growth), and 10 (Reduced Inequalities). Both companies have robust

governance structures that emphasize transparency and business ethics, supporting SDG 16

(Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions).

The comparative analysis revealed that while both companies are committed to sustainability,

their strategies differ significantly. Renault's stronger focus on energy efficiency and electric

vehicles contrasts with Volkswagen's emphasis on community development and education.

Page 13 of 14

81

Bezerra, L. T. do S., Santos, Z. C., de Oliveira, M. A. C. M., Moreira, A. L. S., Junior, P. M. G., Oliveira, J. M. A. M., Domingues, M. A. de O., do Carvalho,

F. F., Medeiros, E. C., Lyra, M. R. C. C., & do Nascimento, R. M. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of ESG Strategies and Their Impact on Sustainable

Development Goals (SDGs) in the Automotive Industry: A Case Study of Renault and Volkswagen. Archives of Business Research, 12(6). 69-82.

URL: http://doi.org/10.14738/abr.126.17176

These differences highlight the diverse approaches within the automotive industry toward

achieving sustainability goals.

While this study provides valuable insights into the ESG practices of Renault and Volkswagen,

it has several limitations. Firstly, the analysis is based on publicly available sustainability

reports, which may not capture all aspects of the companies' ESG strategies and performance.

Secondly, the study focuses on two automakers, limiting the generalizability of the findings to

the broader automotive industry. Thirdly, the analysis is retrospective, primarily covering the

period up to 2022, and may not fully reflect recent developments or future plans. Lastly, the

assessment relies on the accuracy and completeness of the data reported by the companies,

which can be subject to biases and reporting inconsistencies.

Future research should aim to address these limitations by expanding the scope of the analysis

to include a larger sample of automakers and other industries. Longitudinal studies that track

the evolution of ESG practices over time can provide deeper insights into the effectiveness and

impact of these initiatives. Additionally, incorporating qualitative methods, such as interviews

with key stakeholders, can enrich the understanding of the challenges and opportunities

associated with implementing ESG practices. Further research could also explore the financial

performance implications of ESG strategies, providing a more comprehensive view of the

business case for sustainability.

References

[1] J. C. Barbieri, Desenvolvimento sustentável: das origens à Agenda 2030. Editora Vozes, 2020.

[2] F. T. de Carvalho, “a agenda 2030 para o desenvolvimento sustentável da onu e seus atores: o impacto do

desenvolvimento sustentável nas relações internacionais,” Confluências| Rev. Interdiscip. Sociol. e Direito,

vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 5–19, 2021.

[3] H. A. R. Irigaray and F. Stocker, “ESG: novo conceito para velhos problemas,” Cadernos EBAPE. BR, vol. 20.

SciELO Brasil, pp. 1–4, 2022.

[4] J. A. Neto, L. C. dos Anjos, Y. Cavalcante, and P. K. Jukemura, ESG Investing: Um novo paradigma de

investimentos? à. Editora Blucher, 2022.

[5] Volkswagen do Brasil, “Relatório de Sustentabilidade Volkswagen 2022,” 2022. [Online]. Available:

https://www.vwfs.com.br/content/dam/bluelabel/valid/www-vwfs-com-br/relatorio-anual/1.

Relatório Anual 2022 versão completa.pdf.

[6] Renault do Brasil, “Relatório de Sustentabilidade Renault 2022,” 2022. [Online]. Available:

https://institutorenault.com.br/relatorio.

[7] M. F. C. Marques, “Agenda 2030: objetivos do desenvolvimento sustentável (ODS) da ONU: desafios ao

desenvolvimento tecnológico e à inovação empresarial.” Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa,

2020.

[8] K. Krippendorff, Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications, 2018.

[9] K. A. Neuendorf, The content analysis guidebook. sage, 2017.

[10] B. X. Lee et al., “Transforming our world: implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable

development goal indicators,” J. Public Health Policy, vol. 37, pp. 13–31, 2016.

Page 14 of 14

82

Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 12, Issue 6, June-2024

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

[11] M. S. Dincă, C.-D. Vezeteu, and D. Dincă, “The relationship between ESG and firm value. Case study of the

automotive industry,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 10, p. 1059906, 2022.

[12] Deloitte, “Global Human Capital Trends Report,” 2021. [Online]. Available:

https://www2.deloitte.com/ua/en/pages/about-deloitte/press-releases/gx-2021-global-human-capital- trends-report.html.

[13] McKinsey Quarterly, “How to make ESG real,” 2022.

https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/how-to-make-esg-real (accessed

May 01, 2024).

[14] B. Boze, M. Krivitski, D. F. Larcker, B. Tayan, and E. Zlotnicka, “The business case for ESG,” Rock Cent. Corp.

Gov. Stanford Univ. Closer Look Ser. Top. Issues Controv. Corp. Gov. No. CGRP-77, 2019.

[15] S. Reporting, “Global reporting initiative,” 2022.

[16] T. Feist, “The Three Scopes of Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” J. Prop. Manag., vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 24–26, 2018.