Page 1 of 9
Archives of Business Research – Vol. 12, No. 11
Publication Date: November 25, 2024
DOI:10.14738/abr.1211.17801.
Harper, A., Sokunle, R., & Rachevski, I. (2024). Economic Growth, Money Supply, Government Spending, Government Revenue and
Inflation in Nigeria: An Empirical Perspective. Archives of Business Research, 12(11). 01-09.
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
Economic Growth, Money Supply, Government Spending,
Government Revenue and Inflation in Nigeria: An Empirical
Perspective
Alan Harper
Gwynedd Mercy University
Raufu Sokunle
Société Générale Investment Bank
Israel Rachevski
Western Gailee College
ABSTRACT
This study examines the relationship between real GDP (RGDP) and key economic
variables—money supply, inflation, government spending, government revenue,
and exchange rates—in Nigeria from 2004 to 2019. Using a multiple regression
model, the findings reveal a strong fit, with an R Square value of 0.723, indicating
that 72.3% of the variability in RGDP is explained by the model. The results show
that government spending and revenue have a significant positive impact on
economic growth, while inflation and money supply are associated with negative
effects. The exchange rate also positively influences RGDP, though to a lesser extent.
These findings highlight the importance of prudent fiscal and monetary policies in
fostering sustained economic growth in Nigeria.
Keywords: Inflation, Economic Growth, Nigeria, Regression
INTRODUCTION
Over the years, there has been an ongoing debate in the literature regarding the relationship
between inflation and economic growth in both developing and Western nations. Prior to the
1970s, the prevailing belief was that there was either no relationship or a positive relationship
between inflation and growth. Two major schools of thought have emerged on this issue. The
first is the structuralist perspective, which argues that inflation is essential and beneficial for
economic growth. The second is the monetarist perspective, which contends that inflation is
harmful to economic growth. Friedman (1973:4) succinctly encapsulated this debate by noting
that some countries have experienced economic growth with or without inflation.
In this paper, we contribute to this ongoing discussion by examining the relationship between
economic growth, money supply, and inflation in Nigeria. Nigeria was chosen due to its
prolonged struggle with high inflation and low economic growth, as well as its status as one of
the largest economies in the Sub-Saharan region with significant economic potential.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between inflation, money supply, and
economic growth in Nigeria. We use the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as a proxy for inflation and
Page 2 of 9
2
Archives of Business Research (ABR) Vol. 12, Issue 11, November-2024
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
Real Gross Domestic Product (RGDP) as a proxy for economic growth. Additionally, we include
Broad Money as a policy tool used by Central Banks to control inflation and promote economic
growth. A multiple regression model is developed to analyze this relationship.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section II provides a brief review of the
literature, Section III details the methodology and data sources, Section IV discusses the
empirical results, and Section V presents the conclusion.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Paul, Kearny, and Chowdhury (1997) investigated the relationship between inflation and
economic growth in eight developing countries over the period from 1960 to 1989. Their
findings indicated no significant relationship between inflation and economic growth.
However, other studies have found varying results, with some identifying a positive
relationship and others a negative one. For instance, studies by Fisher (1993), Barro (1996),
and Bruno and Easterly (1998) reported a negative relationship between inflation and
economic growth.
Mohanty et al. (2011) explored the possibility of a linear relationship between inflation and
economic growth in India using quarterly data. They suggested that an inflation rate of 4 to 5.5
percent could be considered an inflation threshold, although their findings were inconclusive
regarding the existence of both the threshold and the relationship between inflation and
economic growth.
Paul et al. (1997) used annual data covering the period from 1960 to 1989 on 48 developing
countries and 22 developed ones to reassess the relationship between inflation and economic
growth. Their studies revealed mixed results, with some countries showing a negative
relationship and others a positive one.
In 1974, the Central Bank of Nigeria examined the relationship between inflation and economic
growth in 11 African countries. The study found that the price coefficient in the growth
regression was negative for six countries, while it was positive for the remaining five. However,
the study's assumption that price was the only relevant variable influencing output was flawed,
rendering the results questionable.
Malla (1997) analyzed the relationship between inflation and economic growth in 11 OECD
countries using pooled time series data. The study found that the negative effects of inflation
on economic growth far outweighed any positive effects. These results corroborated the
findings of Bruno and Easterly (1998), who used a cross-country method to investigate the
relationship. Their research indicated that the negative impact of inflation on growth becomes
more apparent in countries with extreme inflation values, particularly those with double-digit
inflation rates. Bullard (1995) also affirmed the findings of Bruno and Easterly, noting that the
detrimental effects of inflation on growth only become significant once certain inflation
thresholds are exceeded.
Mallik et al. (2001) investigated the relationship between inflation and growth in four South
Asian countries by employing co-integration and error correction models. Their results