Page 1 of 10
121
Archives of Business Review – Vol. 8, No.10
Publication Date: October 25, 2020
DOI: 10.14738/abr.810.9282.
Stenis, J. (2020). An Economic Instrument to Reduce the Crime Rate in Sweden. Archives of Business Research, 8(10). 121-130.
An Economic Instrument to Reduce the Crime Rate in Sweden
Jan Stenis
Kristianstad, Sweden
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Crime is one of the most important social problems,
affecting public safety, children’s development, and adult
socioeconomic status. The Naturally Optimised Revenue Demand in
Communities, NORDIC model was applied to reduce the crime rate.
Methods: The NORDIC model that formed the basis of my study, was
adapted to crime prevention. The approach was tested in a realistic
case study on the crime rates in Sweden. Results: Governments
obtained a tool to monitor, manage and evaluate the criminality. End
users including law enforcement authorities and politicians could also
use the tool to redesign the crime policy. The launched model produced
constructed shadow costs to induce economic incentives to reduce the
crime rate. The model considered the public’s awareness about crime.
Conclusions: This paper introduced a practical, economic instrument
for improved management of the crime rates. The NORDIC model could
be used to reduce the Swedish crime rates and its danger to health as
well as to raise the public’s awareness of crime issues.
Keywords: Crime prevention; Economic instrument; Incentives; Sweden.
INTRODUCTION
Crime is one of the most important social problems, affecting public safety, children’s development,
and adult’s socioeconomic status. Understanding factors that may cause higher crime rates is
critical to enable policy makers reduce crime rates and enhance citizens' quality of life [1].
Excessive crime is a global problem with enormous economic consequences. In Sweden, the
national costs of prison and probation services in 2018 was approximately USD950 million. In
2012, these services cost USD760 million [2]. In 2018, 16 per cent of the Swedes believed that law
and order was the most important problem. In 2014, the same figure was 4 per cent [3]. The explicit
purpose of adopting the legal changes in Sweden in 2001 was to improve the support accorded to
crime victims. However, actors in the law-making process indicate that their motives in this
process were symbolic and toughening the penal law and promoting victim impact statements was
not in line with social democratic ideology [4]. Therefore, the results of this paper will be important
in limiting the Swedish crime rate.
This paper addresses the nations’ criminality-burden. The objective of this study was to launch a
practical method of reducing the crime rate by designing a decision-support tool to be used by
authorities, politicians and other citizens interested in crime policy to facilitate the daily use of the
Naturally Optimized Revenue Demand in Communities, the NORDIC model [5-9]. This was done to
facilitate the use of the NORDIC model by authorities and crime managers. My hypothesis was that
Page 2 of 10
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/abr.810.9282 122
Stenis, J. (2020). An Economic Instrument to Reduce the Crime Rate in Sweden. Archives of Business Research, 8(10). 121-130.
by applying the NORDIC model, the crime prevention could be enhanced. Moreover, my research
question was whether it was possible to reduce the crime rate by employing economic instruments.
My research focused on accomplishing feats that would result in drastic changes. A case study using
an analytical approach of stakeholders was conducted. The research design had a logical approach
inherent in the mathematics of the NORDIC model that has historical data. However, a quantitative
research methodology dominated the research process and increased the scientific rigor of the
study to support decision making. My tool expanded knowledge on crime prevention and increased
the public’s awareness.
The background and motivation for the study has already been given. Subsequently, the theory for
the NORDIC model will be outlined with a description on how it is used. The case study will show
how the crime rate in the nation of Sweden can be reduced by applying the model. Subsequently,
the paper will present the results and discussion, conclusion, benefits of the proposed model, and
recommendations for authorities and politicians follow.
The practical implications of this study are better circumstances for the inmates and affected
citizens. Leaders can also logically explain their reasons for initiating actions as opposed to basing
their decisions on emotional reasons. This study filled a research gap by providing new economic
instruments to manage criminality. The results of this study could potentially improve the
economy and the living conditions, due to limits in criminality.
LITERATURE REVIEW
A review of state-of-the-art works by other academics on crime, crime rate, crime prevention,
criminality, relapse prevention, economic instruments, shadow costs, and models was conducted.
The review showed that Hajela et al. [10], using historic crime events as indicators to predict crime,
found that a model with hotspot analysis achieves better performance. Hazra [11] who investigated
the determinants of crime in India found that only Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) per capita
could explain the total crime rates.
Berg and Jeong-Yoo [12] showed that the equilibrium crime rate was stable whenever the broken
window policy targeted the lowest among multiple equilibrium crime rates. Taylor et al. [13]
examined the determinants of park crime by drawing together threads from community
criminology into one conceptual frame. H. Wang et al. [1] observed that performance in crime rate
inference significantly improved when employing the geographically weighted regression on top
of the negative binomial model (GWNBR) and this outperformed the negative binomial model. Y.
Wang et al. [14] collected Twitter data and presented preliminary evidence that social media data
could be used to help predict crimes. Zaman et al. [15] showed a positive relationship between the
presence of scientific and technical journals (STJ) articles and crime rates. The results of panel
causality confirmed the unidirectional causality running from crime rate to STJ and R&D
expenditures.
Ingilevich and Ivanov [16] compared different approaches to forecasting the number of crimes in
different areas of the city and determined that gradient boosting was the most appropriate method
for crime rate prediction. Quick et al. [17] applied a set of Bayesian multivariate spatial models to
analyze burglary, robbery, vehicle crime, and violent crime at the small-area scale. They found that