Page 1 of 7
European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 11, No. 2
Publication Date: April 25, 2023
DOI:10.14738/aivp.112.14385.
Partom, Y. (2023). Modeling Dynamic Rate Dependent Pore Closure with a Range of Pore Sizes. European Journal of Applied
Sciences, Vol - 11(2). 491-497.
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
Modeling Dynamic Rate Dependent Pore Closure with a Range of
Pore Sizes
Y. Partom
18 Habanim, Zikhron Ya'akov 3094017, Israel
ABSTRACT
Previously we presented a model (which we call PORT) with rate dependent pore
closing/opening, for which we assumed that all pores close/open with the same
dynamics [1]. Here we upgrade PORT to take into account different dynamics as
function of pore size. We represent different pore sizes by their volume (v), and we
have k discrete pore sizes. We therefore call this model VK. For the ith pore size we
have ni, i=1,k pores per unit mass. We’re not aware of information on pore size
distributions of porous materials, and we assume arbitrarily that pore sizes are
initially distributed with a log-normal distribution. Similar to PORT, we define
quasistatic pore closure curves that depend on pore volume v, and we compute the
rate of pore closure with a linear overstress equation relative to these curves. From
the values of v and vdot (rate of change of v) we then compute (for each cell and for
each time) the overall porosity and its rate of change dot. Finally, we compute
Pdot and Tdot (P=pressure and T=temperature) in the same way as in PORT, using
the equation of state of the porous material. To show how our VK model works, we
apply it to a simple 1D problem: a 20GPa sustained pressure pulse enters a porous
aluminum target. We show histories of pressure, temperature and porosity at
several locations into the target. We compare these curves to the ones obtained for
k=1 (which are as in PORT).
INTRODUCTION
Some time ago we developed a model for time dependent pore closing/opening in porous
materials [1, and see also references therein], which we call PORT (POR for porous and T to
indicate that we also calculate temperature changes). In PORT we assume that all pores
close/open with the same dynamics and can be therefore represented by a single variable
which is the porosity . But it makes more sense to assume that pores of different sizes have
different closing/opening dynamics. For instance, we tend to assume intuitively that it would
be harder to close small pores than to close large pores. Accordingly, we develop here a time
dependent pore closure model that treats pores of different sizes, and assumes for them
different dynamics.
PORE DESCRIPTION AND INITIAL CONDITIONS
We represent a pore size by its volume v. At this stage of model development, we ignore the
influence of pore shape. We consider a finite number k of pore volumes. For each pore volume
vi(i=1,k) there are ni pores of the same volume per unit mass. The total void volume per unit
mass (=void) and the porosity are then given by:
Page 3 of 7
493
Partom, Y. (2023). Modeling Dynamic Rate Dependent Pore Closure with a Range of Pore Sizes. European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol - 11(2).
491-497.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.112.14385.
Figure 1. Initial pore volume distribution.
PORE CLOSURE EQUATIONS
As in PORT, here too the pore closure equations are rate equations (ODEs), that we integrate
separately for each computational cell and for each time step. The number of rate equations is
k+2, k for the different pore volumes and 2 for pressure and temperature. For each of the k pore
volumes (and for each cell and time step) we have a separate quasistatic closure curve, and we
assume that a quasistatic closure curve depends on pore volume by:
P P exp v v qsi c i c = −( ) (6)
where the parameters Pc,vc are common to all quasistatic closure curves. These parameters can
be calibrated from quasistatic tests. We determine the rate of pore closure by the overstress
equation:
i c qsi qsi i ( )
i
v A P P P P V 0 v 0
otherwise :v 0
= −
=
(7)
Knowing the values of vi and vdoti, we proceed to calculate and dot by the following
equations:
i i i i
i i
2
void v n voiddot v n
void voiddot void V
V V V
= =
= = −
(8)