Page 1 of 16
European Journal of Applied Sciences – Vol. 12, No. 6
Publication Date: December 25, 2024
DOI:10.14738/aivp.126.17880.
Ayala, Y. S. S. (2024). Existence of the Local Solution of a Non-Homogeneous Schrödinger Type Equation. European Journal of
Applied Sciences, Vol - 12(6). 153-168.
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
Existence of the Local Solution of a Non-Homogeneous
Schrödinger Type Equation
Yolanda Silvia Santiago Ayala
ORCID: 0000-0003-2516-0871
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos,
Fac. de Ciencias Matemáticas, Av. Venezuela Cda. 34 Lima-PERU
ABSTRACT
In this article, we prove that initial value problem associated to the Schrödinger
type non homogeneous equation in periodic Sobolev spaces has a local solution in
[0, T] with T > 0, and the solution has continuous dependence with respect to the
initial data and the non homogeneous part of the problem. We do this in a intuitive
way using Fourier theory and introducing a Co- group inspired by the work of Iorio
[1] and Santiago [7]. Also, we prove the uniqueness solution of the Schrödinger
type homogeneous equation, using its conservative property, inspired by the work
of Iorio [1] and Santiago [6]. Finally, we study its generalization to n-th order
equation.
Keywords: Uniqueness solution, Schrödinger type equation, non homogeneous
equation, n-th order equation, periodic Sobolev spaces, Fourier Theory, calculus in
Banach spaces.
INTRODUCTION
First, we want to comment that from Theorem 3.1 in [5], we have that the homogeneous
problem is globally well posed and, in addition to the equality (3.2) in [5], we have the
continuous dependence of the solution of homogeneous problem respect to the initial data.
In this work, in Theorem 3.2 we will prove the existence and uniqueness of the local solution
for the non homogeneous problem and from inequality (3.8) we will get the continuous
dependence of the solution with respect to the initial data and respect to the non
homogeneous part.
Thus, in both homogeneous and non homogeneous cases, the estimatives are made from the
explicit form of the solution, that is, by applying the Fourier transform to the respective
equation. Another result in this work is about the conservative property of the homogeneous
problem and some estimates of it, using differential calculus in Hper
s
. This is included in
Theorem 3.3 which we will develop in subsection 3.2. So, using Theorem 3.3, we deduce the
results of continuous dependence and uniqueness of solution for homogeneous problem.
Finally, we get to generalize the results obtained.
We cite some works about Schrödinger equation [1], [5] and for dissipative properties of
systems [2].
Page 2 of 16
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom 154
European Journal of Applied Sciences (EJAS) Vol. 12, Issue 6, December-2024
Our article is organized as follows. In section 2, we indicate the methodology used and cite the
references used. In section 3, we proved the main results for the non homogeneous
Schrödinger type equation. Also, in this section we manage to generalize the results to the n- th order equation.
Finally, in section 4, we give the conclusions of our study.
METHODOLOGY
As a theoretical framework in this article we use the existence and regularity results of [5].
Also, we use the references [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] and [3] for the Fourier theory in periodic
Sobolev spaces, and differential and integral calculus in Banach spaces.
MAIN RESULTS
First, using the Fourier transform, we will prove that the non homogeneous problem has a
unique solution and it continuously depends respect to the initial data and the non
homogeneity in compact intervals.
Second, we will study the uniqueness of the solution for homogeneous case using another
technique that involves the conservative property of the problem.
Finally, we will get to generalize the results to n-th order equation.
The Non Homogeneous Problem (Q3
F
) is Locally Well Posed
Theorem 3.1:
Let s a fixed real number, F ∈ C([0, T], Hper
s
), where T>0, {S(t)}t∈R the unitary group of class
Co of homogeneous case (F = 0), introduced in the Theorem 4.1 from [5], and
up
(t): = ∫ S(t − τ)F(τ)dτ
t
0
.
Then up ∈ C([0, T], Hper
s
) ∩ C
1
([0, T], Hper
s−2
) and satisfies
|
∂tup
(t) − iμ∂x
2up
(t) + iα up
(t) = F(t) ∈ Hper
s−2
up
(0) = 0
(3.1)
with the derivative given by
lim
h→0
‖
up(t+h)−up(t)
h
− iμ∂x
2up
(t) + iα up
(t) − F(t)‖
s−2
= 0. (3.2)
Proof:
We remark that S(t − τ)F(τ) ∈ Hper
s
,∀τ ∈ (0,t) and τ → S(t − τ)F(τ) is continuous in [0, t]
then exists
∫ S(t − τ)F(τ)dτ t
⏟0
up
(t) =
∈ Hper
s
.