Page 1 of 19
DOI: 10.14738/aivp.86.9072
Publication Date: 31st October, 2020
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.86.9072
Effects of NPK Fertilizer and Farmyard Manure Rates on Millet
Performance in Sudan and Sahel Savanna Soils Of Northeast
Nigeria
1
Adam Lawan Ngala, 2
Bukar Bababe and2
Aishatu Mala Musa 1
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Maiduguri. P.M.B. 1069, Maiduguri,
Nigeria. 2
Department of Soil Science, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, P.M.B. 2076, Yola, Nigeria
ABSTRACT
Field experiments were conducted in 2008 and 2009 rainy seasons at the Research and Demonstration
Farms of Lake Chad Research Institute at Maiduguri and Gashua stations to study the effect of NPK
fertilizer and farmyard manure rates on millet performance in Sudan and Sahel savannas of northeast
Nigeria. The treatments consisted of factorial combinations of three levels of NPK fertilizer (NPK 0:0:0,
30:15:15 and 60:30:30 kg ha-1
) and four levels of farmyard manure (0, 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 tonnes ha-1
). The
experiments were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) and replicated three times.
The parameters determined were plant height at 3, 6 and 9 weeks after sowing (WAS), straw, grain and
above ground total biomass yields. The results of soil physico-chemical properties indicated low fertility
status as typified by the low contents of N, P, Ca, Mg and low CEC, but moderate K. The application of
NPK fertilizer and farmyard (FYM) manure either alone or in combination significantly influenced most
of the parameters. The individual effect of NPK at half and full recommended rates were at par on most
of the parameters, but significantly superior to the control. The individual effect of FYM was variable
and more pronounced with the two higher rates of 5.0t and 7.5t FYM compared to the two lower rates
of 0.0t and 2.5t FYM rates. Optimum millet growth and yield were superior with NPK 30:15:15, combined
with 5.0t FYM more than other combination rates at early growth stage. At mid and late stage of growth,
interaction of NPK 30:15:15 + 7.5t FYM produced significantly the tallest plants. Grain, straw and total
biomass yield in Maiduguri were 129%, 71%, and 76% increase over the control, respectively. Similar
results were obtained in Gashua, with higher yields at NPK 30:15:15 + 5.0t FYM. Based on the results it
can be concluded that application of NPK 30:15:15 combined with 5.0t and 7.5t ha-1 FYM could be viable
management practice for sustained millet production in Sudan and Sahel savannas of northeast Nigeria.
Keywords: NPK fertilizer, Farmyard manure, Millet yield, Sudan and Sahel savannas.
1 Introduction
Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] is a staple food crop for about six million poor people in the
most marginal agricultural lands of north-east Nigeria and therefore plays a critical role in food security
(Elemo and Chube, 1995). These marginal lands are regions where the expanding desert is destroying
the productivity of approximately 25 million hectares of land every year, creating conditions on which
this crop can be cultivated but with low yields (Ikwelle, 1998). In the drier and low resource agricultural
situations of these regions where other sister crops such as corn cannot grow or often fail, this cereal
will produce grain, but yields are low as a result of low and erratic rainfall, high temperature, low
inherent soil fertility, and numerous biotic stresses. The yield of this crop was observed to be declining
Page 2 of 19
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 8 No. 6, December 2020
Services for Science and Education, United Kingdom 63
in recent years. This was attributed to nutrient depletion relative to addition (Maiangwa, 2009) and has
been reported to be one of the most important constraints leading to the decline in yield of the crop in
these zones. In addition, blanket nutrient recommendations were made and applied based on estimates
and there is paucity of information on soil-plant nutrient balance study and if available are mostly
generalized.
Different strategies have been adopted over the years in order to assess the extent of nutrient losses
and offer solutions to the problems. The ability of soils to provide nutrients for crop production is
enhanced by systematic returns of nutrients. Maintenance of proper nutrient status in soil is a key factor
for high yield production. In order to properly manage nutrient balance of a soil system in a sustainable
way, it is necessary first to know the availability, depletion and balance of nutrient in a soil system (Myint
et al., 1997). It is recognized that sustainable high yield systems require both adequate nutrient supplies
to growing crops as well as continual improvements to the soil’s nutrient status and quality (De ren and
Wan-fang, 1998). Innovative combinations of organic and inorganic nutrient sources must be used to
increase inputs and to recycle the nutrients once they reach the soil. This suggests that part of the
problem of nutrient deficiencies can be addressed through judicious use of organic inputs. Nyathi et al.
(2003) while studying the efficacy of combinations of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients
concluded that synergism existed only when combinations of inputs to sandy soil included organic
fertilizers. Kwari et al. (1998) also recognized the beneficial effect of continuous application of FYM along
with mineral fertilizers.
The essential aspect of maintaining soil fertility is making available in the upper layers of the soil (0-20
cm) sufficient nutrients in the right proportion to allow plants to absorb them, irrespective of total
nutrient content. In order to restore soil fertility on a sustainable basis, the initial steps involved are the
monitoring how soil fertility is being degraded and rate of degradation under continuous cropping.
Application of mineral fertilizers in the soil of semi-arid region is a costly affair owing to their non- availability in sufficient quantity and if available, high cost (Brady and Weil, 2002). The characteristic of
mineral fertilizers is that their beneficial effect is more in the short-run as compared to organic sources,
though the availability of the later is also a constraint. Studies conducted around Sudan savanna region
point to the direction that while the pronounced yield increase, consequent on mineral fertilizer
application, is apparent in the short-run, their continuous use, however, tends to alter the physico- chemical properties of the soil, resulting in progressive decline in fertility (Rayar, 2000). If mineral
fertilizers are used in conjunction with organic manures, the productivity of the soils is expected to
improve significantly.
Increasing the productivity of these crops in such low-yielding and unpredictable environment, to keep
pace with the increasing food demand of the growing population in the region is a task requiring
concerted efforts. This calls for Integrated Nutrient Management (INM) as an approach in addressing
soil fertility decline, especially in northeast Nigeria. The focus of this study is therefore to confirm the
effects of FYM and NPK and to create new agronomy synergistic combinations for application to crops
desirable for soil fertility management and sustainable crop production.
2 Materials and Methods
Rainy season field experiments were conducted in 2008 and 2009 in two different agro-ecological zones
of north-east Nigeria. The locations are Research and Demonstration Farm of Lake Chad Research
Institute, Maiduguri (11o 51’
N, 13o 16’
E), Borno state in Sudan savanna and at the Institute’s
experimental site, Gashua (12o 49’
N, 11o 10’
E), Yobe state in Sahel savanna of Nigeria as indicated in
Figure 1. The soils of the experimental sites are characterized by aeolian sand formation, loosely
Page 3 of 19
Adam Lawan Ngala, Bukar Bababe and Aishatu Mala Musa. Effects of NPK Fertilizer and Farmyard Manure Rates
on Millet Performance in Sudan and Sahel Savanna Soils Of Northeast Nigeria. European Journal of Applied
Sciences, Volume 8 No 6, Dec 2020; pp: 62-80
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/aivp.86.9072 64
aggregated with a surface sandy loam texture (Chiroma et al., 2003; Kwari and Bibinu, 2002). The soils
are Typic Ustipsamment in Maiduguri (Rayar, 1988) and Psammentic Paleustalf in Gashua (Saidou et al.,
2010). The soils are low in organic carbon, total N, and available P and moderate K. Soil pH is slightly
acidic in Gashua and neutral in Maiduguri (Table 1). Land development and use during the last forty
years has been abusive and exploitative and resulted in degradation of soil and destruction of vegetation
with resultant reduced productivity of both natural and managed ecosystem, leading to desert
encroachment.
Figure 1: The study locations.
Source: Unimaid GEONETCast (2016).
2.1 Treatments and Experimental Design
The experiment consisted of factorial combinations of three levels of NPK fertilizer (NPK 0:0:0, 30:15:15
and 60:30:30 kg ha-1
) and four levels of farmyard manure (0, 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 tonnes ha-1
) for millet as
described by FPDD (1990) for high, medium and low fertility soils. The treatments were arranged in a
randomized complete block design and replicated three times in plot sizes of 4.5 m × 5.25 m.
2.2 Experimental Procedure
The experimental fields were manually cleared, ploughed and harrowed to fine tilt with tractor in the
first season and manually prepared by maintaining the previous plots the second season. Farmyard
manure was applied two weeks before planting. One-third of nitrogen and full phosphorus and
potassium were applied at planting using NPK 15-15-15, SSP (18% P2O5) and Urea (46% N). The remaining
N were applied as micro-dose at 4 and 6 weeks after planting. Millet (SOSAT C-88) seeds obtained from
Lake Chad Research Institute, were sown in the plots after treating the seeds with Apron plus (metalaxyl)
at the rate of 0.25 a. i. kg ha-1
. Weeds were controlled manually using hand hoe first at 3 WAS and
subsequently at three week intervals. Millet and sorghum were harvested after reaching physiological
maturity.
2.3 Collection of Data
2.3.1 Collection, preparation and analysis of soil samples
Three sets of six representative soil samples were collected from the experimental fields at a depth of 0
- 0.2 m in both locations before the experiments. The samples were air dried under shed, bulked, mixed
C:\Users\dr\Desktop\NEAZDP.bmp