Page 1 of 3

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 9, No. 9

Publication Date: September 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/assrj.99.13042. Khizanishvili, S., Dzagania, K., & Butovecky, A. (2022). Modernity and the Question of the Existence of Moral Probabilities. Advances

in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(9). 256-258.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Modernity and the Question of the Existence of Moral

Probabilities

Salome Khizanishvili

Georgian Technical University

Faculty of Law and International Relations

Kakhaber Dzagania

Georgian Technical University

Faculty of Law and International Relations

Arkadii Butovecky

University of Manitoba, Canada

In any era, the legal field of human life is open to both the renewal and implementation

processes of its theoretical and practical requirements. The necessity of fulfilling practical

requirements is caused by epochal changes including economic, political, socio-cultural fields;

And the necessity of fulfilling the theoretical requirements is due to both the peculiarities and

consequences of the development of thinking.

The connection between the forms of consciousness is logical. However, there are still empty

spaces between them. In order to fill these gaps, we would like to start discussing topic related

to a relatively ambitious approach. We refer to the innovative case of using a morality algorithm

in litigation.

The main difficulty of legal consciousness is to determine the concept of law and the essence of

justice; The subject of constant judgment is also the issue of the coexistence of law and morality.

This is the space where the contradictions of law are most clearly revealed. Here are the

contradictions related to the possibilities of independent existence of law representing both a

private field and a special form of consciousness.

Our research has two main goals: 1. We try to follow traditional approaches in both the study

of legal issues and in relation to modernity. We underline both the existing and probable

challenges facing it; 2. We attempt to promote the development of mechanisms regulating both

moral and legal issues. We try to achieve the main goal in a specific way - by developing a moral

algorithm model.

We believe, that the need for a moral algorithm model has solid foundations. However, before

we get focused on the perspective of its usefulness, we should talk about the expediency of its

"allowance". This will give us some clue on the validity of algorithm needs.

It is known, that the values are subjective and they are historically variable; Cultural differences

give rise to different attitudes towards values. i.e. there are lots of difficulties related to both