Page 1 of 8

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 9, No. 10

Publication Date: October 25, 2022

DOI:10.14738/assrj.910.13278. Bektiarso, S., Sudarti, & Wicaksono, I. (2022). The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Social Skills on Science Learning Outcomes for Junior

High School Students in Jember Regency. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(10). 340-347.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Social Skills on Science Learning

Outcomes for Junior High School Students in Jember Regency

Singgih Bektiarso

University of Jember

Sudarti

University of Jember

Iwan Wicaksono

University of Jember

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of self-efficacy and social skills

simultaneously and partially on science learning outcomes for junior high school

(SMP) students in Jember Regency. This research is a type of causality explanatory

research, namely research that intends to explain the effect of the independent

variables on the dependent variable. The data analysis technique used is statistical

test with multiple linear regression test technique using SPSS version 25 statistical

application. The results of the normality test for the variable data are self efficacy

(X1) sig 0.2> 0.05, social skills (X2) sig 0.2> 0.05, and science learning outcomes (Y)

sig 0.178>0.05, thus the data variance of all variables is normally distributed. Thus,

data analysis with multiple linear regression test techniques can be continued.

Based on the results of the regression analysis, it was found that 1) hypothesis

testing there was a significant effect of self-efficacy and social skills on students'

science learning outcomes simultaneously obtained sig 0.000, meaning that this

number was below 0.05, thus the null hypothesis was rejected; 2) hypothesis testing

that there is a significant effect of self-efficacy on students' science learning

outcomes partially obtained sig 0.023, meaning this number is below 0.05, thus the

null hypothesis is rejected; 3) hypothesis testing that there is a significant effect of

social skills on students' science learning outcomes partially obtained 0.003

meaning this number is below 0.05, meaning the null hypothesis is rejected. Based

on this description, it can be concluded that self-efficacy and social skills have a

significant effect simultaneously and partially on science learning outcomes for

junior high school students in Jember Regency.

Keywords: Self-Efficacy, Social Skills, Science, Learning Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Law of the national education system No. 20/2003 (Indonesian Republic Government, 2003)

states that education is a conscious and planned effort to create a learning atmosphere and

learning process so that students actively develop their potential to have religious spiritual

strength, control self, personality, intelligence, noble character, and skills needed by himself

and society. Furthermore, according to Government Regulation No. 66/2010 Concerning

Management and Implementation of Education (Indonesian Republic Government, 2010). It is

Page 2 of 8

341

Bektiarso, S., Sudarti, & Wicaksono, I. (2022). The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Social Skills on Science Learning Outcomes for Junior High School

Students in Jember Regency. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(10). 340-347.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.910.13278

stated that education in junior high school is a formal education level that organizes general

education in basic education as a continuation of SD, MI and other equivalent forms or advanced

results. Learning that is recognized as equivalent to SD and MI. According to the 2013

curriculum, the objectives of junior high school education include factual, conceptual,

procedural, metacognitive and creative skills, productive, critical, independent, collaborative,

communicative (Kemendikbud, 2013). Based on the above, the process of education and

learning in secondary schools requires strategies and approaches that match the targets and

objectives of the curriculum.

Self-efficacy is an individual's belief about his ability to organize and complete a task needed to

achieve certain results (Bandura, 1997). Produce something, and also implement actions in

order to achieve a certain form of skill. This self-efficacy will affect the level of work

productivity, stress levels and also the mental health of the workforce in the many demands

they have to fulfill. The lower the level of self-efficacy in a person, the higher the pressure he

will feel. Self-efficacy indicators according to Lauster (2002) include: 1) belief in self-ability; 2)

optimistic/always good-looking to succeed; 3) objective according to the existing facts; 4) be

responsible for all risks; and 5) rational and use common sense.

Humans as social beings need to communicate socially with other humans. Human activities in

certain communities are determined by the smooth level of social relations. In other words,

social interaction determines the success of programs that are run together in accordance with

the goals set by an organization. Hurlock (1993) states that social adjustment is the success of

a person adapting to other people or in general and to his social group in particular. In any

organization, it is necessary to manage existing resources in order to create a situation that

allows the achievement of goals. According to Comb and Slaby (1977) social skills are the ability

to interact with other people in a social context in a specific way that is socially acceptable or

valued and benefits others. Thus, it can also be said that social skills are a person's level of

proficiency in communicating with others so as to create a conducive social atmosphere

according to the values agreed by the social group. This means that a person is accepted or not

accepted in certain social groups depending on the similarities and certain needs in the group

that have been agreed upon by group members. Indicators of social skills according to Gresham

and Elliot (1990) include 1) easy to work together; 2) assertive behavior is not prestige asking

for help from others; 3) responsibility; 4) empathy others feel comfortable; 5) self-control to

deal with other people's disturbances calmly.

In the process of education and learning, the measure of the achievement of the quality of the

process and learning outcomes can be measured and assessed in terms of student learning

success. Learning is a mental activity that takes place in active interaction with the environment

that results in changes in knowledge, understanding and attitudes. The change in behavior is

constant and scarred (Winkel, 2009). Learning outcomes are changes in knowledge, concepts

and behavior experienced by students after going through a learning process guided by

teachers as facilitators and learning dynamists (Sujana, 2010). Factors that can affect the

quality and learning outcomes in general there are two factors, namely external, and internal.

According to Slameto (2010) internal factors that can affect student learning outcomes are

psychological factors, willingness, talent, and student interest in learning.

Page 3 of 8

342

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 9, Issue 10, October-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Learning outcomes are knowledge, understanding, skills and attitudes obtained by students

after going through the learning process. In learning, there are several supporting components,

namely teachers, students, methods, and learning infrastructure (Sudjana, 2010). Learning

outcomes are evaluation actions that can reveal aspects of thinking, as well as psychological or

attitude aspects, value aspects, and certain skills aspects that already exist in students (Yusuf,

2018). Many internal factors of students' self that can affect student learning outcomes. Two

internal factors that are quite important in influencing learning outcomes, for example, are self- efficacy and students' social skills. Science subjects in junior high schools are learning programs

in the curriculum that develop the concept of natural phenomena and the process of acquiring

concepts and their applications in everyday life (Kemendikbud, 2013). The results of Andriani's

research (2018) state that students' self-efficacy has a significant effect on their learning

outcomes. Likewise, the results of research by Nurulwati et.al (2020) stated that student self- efficacy had a significant positive effect on student physics learning outcomes. On the other

hand, the results of research by Hurst et.al (2013) stated that students' social interactions can

improve students' seeing various perspectives, critical thinking, and students' problem-solving

abilities. Likewise, the results of research by Izzati (2014) state that students' social interaction

skills have a significant effect on students' mathematical communication skills.

The material to be taught in this research is Light and Optical Instruments which will be studied

by SMP/MTs students in class VIII in the second semester. There are two Basic Competencies

(BC) to achieve learning objectives on Light and Optical Instruments based on the Circular

Letter of the Minister of Education and Culture Number 37 of 2018, including: BC 3.12

Analyzing the properties of light, forming shadows on flat and curved planes and their

application, and BC 4.12 Presenting the results of experiments on the formation of images on

mirrors and lenses (Widodo, 2009).

Figure 1. Flat Mirror

METHODOLOGY

The type of research is quantitative research, that is, the variables are expressed in quantitative

data in the form of numbers (Arikunto, 2010). It can also be said that this research is called

explanatory research. The purpose of explanatory research is to test hypotheses and test the

effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable (Sugiyono 2012). The variables

studied were job self-efficacy (X1), social skills (X2), and student achievement (Y). The research

subjects are junior high school students in the city of Jember. The number of research samples

used was 50 students. The research instrument used was a questionnaire with details of the

self-efficacy variables 5 items, social skills 5 items, and student achievement 5 items. The

Page 4 of 8

343

Bektiarso, S., Sudarti, & Wicaksono, I. (2022). The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Social Skills on Science Learning Outcomes for Junior High School

Students in Jember Regency. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(10). 340-347.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.910.13278

questionnaire statement of self efficacy variable and social skills variable uses a Likert scale

with 5 answer options, namely 1. Strongly disagree, 2. Disagree, 3. Neutral, 4. Agree, 5. Strongly

agree. Thus, each respondent in the self-efficacy variable and the social skills variable will get a

score between the value intervals (5–25). While the value of student achievement will get a

value interval of 0-100. The data analysis used is multiple linear regression test because all

variables are in the form of interval data. Stages of analysis in this study include data normality

test, regression test, and significance test. While the data analysis technique in this study used

the SPSS application (Sujarweni, 2015, Erlina et. al, 2018).

The framework of this research can be described in the following figure.

Figure 2. Research Conceptual Framework

Based on the background, theoretical and empirical studies, as well as the conceptual

framework of the research, the following research questions can be asked:

1. Do self-efficacy and social skills simultaneously have a significant effect on science

learning outcomes for junior high school students in Jember Regency?

2. Does self-efficacy partially have a significant effect on science learning outcomes for

junior high school students in Jember Regency?

3. Do social skills partially have a significant effect on science learning outcomes for junior

high school students in Jember Regency?

Based on the research questions above, the following hypotheses can be proposed

H1: self efficacy and social skills simultaneously have a significant effect on Science learning

outcomes for junior high school students in Jember Regency

H2: Self-efficacy partially has a significant effect on the performance of junior high school

teachers in Indonesia Jember

H3: social skills partially have a significant effect on science learning outcomes for junior high

school students in Indonesia Jember

FINDING AND DISCUSSION

Research data on the variables of self-efficacy and social skills were obtained by data collection

techniques through questionnaire answers to 50 junior high school teachers in Jember

Regency. Meanwhile, data on student learning outcomes were obtained using the technique.

Furthermore, based on the results of the recapitulation, data on the variables of self efficacy

(X1), social skills (X2), and science learning outcomes (Y) were obtained from 50 respondents.

S Self Efficacy Sess

(X1)

SSocial Skills

(X2)

Student Achievement

(Y)

Page 5 of 8

344

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 9, Issue 10, October-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

The analysis was carried out with the stages of descriptive test, data normality test, multiple

linear regression test, and significance test.

The description of descriptive statistics on the results of data collection on the variables of self- efficacy, social skills, and science learning outcomes can be shown in the following table.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics of Self Efficacy, Social Skills, and Science Learning Outcomes

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

self_efficacy 50 14.00 26.00 19.9000 2.67452

Social_Skills 50 13.00 25.00 18.9000 2.79394

Learning_Outcome 50 55.00 74.00 63.9000 5.23431

Valid N (listwise) 50

Based on table 3.1, it can be interpreted that the highest average score is on the performance

variable 20.94 with a standard deviation of 4.033. While the lowest score is the work motivation

variable, which is 19.92 with a standard deviation of 4040.

The next step is to test the normality of the data. Based on the non-parametric statistical test

with the one sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov technique, the following output was obtained.

Table 2. Non-Parametric One Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Statistical Test

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

self_efficacy Social_Skills Learning_Outcome

N 50 50 50

Normal

Parametersa,b

Mean 19.9000 18.9000 63.9000

Std. Deviation 2.67452 2.79394 5.23431

Most Extreme

Differences

Absolute .080 .074 .110

Positive .080 .070 .110

Negative -.080 -.074 -.078

Test Statistic .080 .074 .110

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .200c,d .200c,d .178c

a. Test distribution is Normal.

b. Calculated from data.

c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.

d. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Based on the output of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov one sample statistical test, it was obtained that

the significance data (sig) on the job satisfaction variable sig = 0.200 means 0.2 > 0.05, thus the

data on the self-efficacy variable is normally distributed. The social skills variable with a

significance (sig) of 0.200 means 0.2 > 0.05, thus the data for the social skills variable is

normally distributed. Furthermore, the variable learning outcomes obtained 0.1780 means

0.178> 0.05 thus learning outcomes data is normally distributed.

Page 6 of 8

345

Bektiarso, S., Sudarti, & Wicaksono, I. (2022). The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Social Skills on Science Learning Outcomes for Junior High School

Students in Jember Regency. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(10). 340-347.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.910.13278

The next step is to test the hypothesis using parametric statistics with multiple linear

regression test techniques. The output of statistical tests with multiple linear regression

techniques can be displayed in the following output tables.

Table 3. Multiple Linear Regression Model Summary

Model Summary

Model R R Square

Adjusted R

Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

1 .929a .863 .857 1.97813

a. Predictors: (Constant), Social_Skills, self_efficacy

Based on Table 3.3 obtained R Square 0.863, this can be interpreted that students' science

learning outcomes are influenced by self-efficacy and social skills by 86.3% while the rest is

influenced by other factors. Furthermore, to test the hypothesis of the effect of self-efficacy and

social skills partially and simultaneously on science learning outcomes, it can be explained in

the following table output analysis.

Table 4 Multiple Linear Regression Test

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 29.168 2.138 13.644 .000

self_efficacy .786 .335 .402 2.344 .023

Social_Skills 1.010 .321 .539 3.147 .003

a. Dependent Variable: Learning_Outcome

Based on table 3.4 above, it can be done a significance test by confirming the significance value

of the influence of self-efficacy, social skills partially and simultaneously on students' science

learning outcomes. The discussion of the hypothesis significance test can be described as

follows.

Effect of Simultaneous Self Efficacy and Social Skills on Science Learning Outcomes of

Junior High School Students

The hypothesis of self-efficacy and social skills simultaneously significantly influence the

science learning outcomes of junior high school students can be tested for significance by

comparing the sig value with a value of 0.05. Based on table 3.4, it is found that the significance

value is 0.000, this value is smaller than 0.05. Thus, it can be concluded that self-efficacy and

social skills simultaneously have a significant influence on the science learning outcomes of

junior high school students in Jember Regency. It can also be interpreted that if the value of self- efficacy and social skills is higher, the higher the value of students' science learning outcomes.

The Effect of Partial Self Efficacy on Science Learning Outcomes of Junior High School

Students

The self-efficacy hypothesis has a partially significant effect on performance, its significance can

be tested by comparing the sig value with a value of 0.05. Based on table 3.4, it is found that the

significance value is 0.023, this value is smaller than 0.05. Thus, it can be concluded that self-

Page 7 of 8

346

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 9, Issue 10, October-2022

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

efficacy has a partially significant effect on the science learning outcomes of junior high school

students in Jember Regency. It can also be interpreted that if the value of self-efficacy is higher,

the higher the value of students' science learning outcomes.

The Partial Effect of Social Skills on Science Learning Outcomes of Junior High School

Students

The hypothesis of social skills partially significant effect on science learning outcomes can be

tested for its significance by comparing the sig value with a value of 0.05. Based on table 3.4, it

is found that the significance value is 0.002, this value is smaller than 0.05. Thus, it can be

concluded that social skills have a significant influence partially on the science learning

outcomes of junior high school students in Jember Regency. It can also be interpreted that if the

value of self-efficacy is higher, the higher the value of students' science learning outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data analysis and discussion, it can be concluded as follows:

1. Self efficacy and social skills simultaneously have a significant effect on science learning

outcomes for junior high school students in Jember Regency.

2. Self efficacy partially has a significant effect on science learning outcomes for junior high

school students in Jember Regency.

3. Social skills partially have a significant effect on science learning outcomes for junior

high school students in Jember Regency.

References

Andriani (2018) The Influence of Confidence, Study Habits and Learning Motivation on Student Learning

Outcomes in Economics Subjects, Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Manajemen dan keuangan, 2(1) 19-28.

Arikunto. 2010 Research Procedure: A Practical Approach. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Bandura, A. 1997. Self Efficacy – The Exercise of Control (Fifth Printing). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company

Combs, M. L. and Slaby, D.A. 1977. Social skill training with children. New York:

Plennum Press.

Erlina, N., Susantini, E., Wicaksono, I., & Pandiangan, P. (2018). The Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Reasoning in

Inquiry-Based Physics Teaching to Increase Students' Scientific Reasoning. Journal of Baltic Science

Education, 17(6), 972-985.

Gresham, F. M., and Elliot, S. N. 1990. The Social Skills Rating System. Cirle Pines, MN : American Guidance Service.

Hurlock, E.B. 1993. Child Development. Jakarta: Erlangga Press.

Hurst, B., Wallace, and Nixon, S. 2013. The Impact of Social Interaction on Student Learning. Reading Horizons: A

Journal of Literacy and Language Arts. 52(4) 376-398.

Izzati. 2014.The Effect of social skills on students' mathematical communication skills. Jurnal edueksos 3(1) 87-

100

Indonesian Republic Government. 2003. Law of the national education system No 20/2003. Jakarta: Indonesian

Republic Government.

Indonesia Republic Government. 2010. Government Regulation No. 66/2010 Concerning Management and

Implementation of Education. Jakarta: Indonesian Republic Government.

Kemdikbud. 2013. Junior high school curriculum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Lauster, P. 2002. The Personality Test. London: Part Book

Page 8 of 8

347

Bektiarso, S., Sudarti, & Wicaksono, I. (2022). The Effect of Self-Efficacy and Social Skills on Science Learning Outcomes for Junior High School

Students in Jember Regency. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(10). 340-347.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.910.13278

Nurulwati, Khairina and Huda. 2020. The effect of students self-efficacy on the learning outcomes in learning

physics. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1460 012113.

Sudjana, N. 2010. Learning Process Basics. Bandung:Sinar Baru.

Sugiyono. 2012. Qualitative, Quantitative Research and R&D Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujarweni. 2015. SPSS for Research. (Jogjakarta: Pustaka Baru Press

Slameto. 2010, Learning and the factors that influence it. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Widodo, T. 2009. IPA Terpadu untuk SMP/MTs kelas VIII. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan

Nasional.

Winkel. 2009. Teaching Psychology. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Yusuf, B. B. 2018. Effective Learning Concepts and Indicators. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran dan Keilmuan. 1(2) 13-

20.