Page 1 of 18

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 10, No. 2

Publication Date: February 25, 2023

DOI:10.14738/assrj.102.13937.

Kosimbei, G. K., Omolo, J. O., Rono, G. J., Musyoka, P. K., & Onono, P. A. (2023). Coping Mechanisms to Income Loss by Girls and

Women During COVID-19: Evidence from Selected Informal Settlements in Kenya. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal,

10(2). 447-464.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Coping Mechanisms to Income Loss by Girls and Women During

COVID-19: Evidence from Selected Informal Settlements in Kenya

George K. Kosimbei

School of Economics, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Jacob O. Omolo

School of Economics, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Gladys J. Rono

School of Economics, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Peter K. Musyoka

School of Economics, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Perez A. Onono

School of Economics, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Abstract

This study investigated the coping mechanisms that were adopted by girls and

women to mitigate the impacts of income loss due to COVID-19 pandemic. A mixed

methods approach involving use of desk review, cross-sectional survey, key

informant interviews and focus group discussions was employed. A logit regression

model was estimated using data collected from 402 randomly selected households

from Kibra, Mathare, Obunga and Nyawita informal settlements. Most households

in the informal settlements lost employment and incomes during the pandemic

leading to increased food insecurity. Girls and women bore a disproportionate

share of the burden of employment and income loss and could not access basic

necessities including food and house rent, suffered increased sexual harassment,

exploitation and abuse, and experienced increase in conflicts within households. To

mitigate the impacts of income loss, households reduced food intake or skipped

meals, made use of social support systems, begged from well-wishers. Use of risky

and negative coping mechanisms including early and forced marriage, as well as

transactional sex increased among adolescent girls, and young and older women.

The study recommends design and implementation of business and non-business

development services to engage women entrepreneurs in more stable income

generating activities for enhanced post COVID-19 recovery. Further, County

government departments for gender, youth and cultural services, and community

and faith-based organizations should undertake more sensitization programmes in

the informal settlements to influence attitudes of girls and young women on early

marriage and transactional sex. Government-based social protection programmes

for the vulnerable households should be made more open and transparent, free

from harm, manipulations and abuse. Beneficiary targeting of such programmes

should also be based on the differential vulnerabilities of households in each

location. Early response of the government and other institutions to cushion

Page 2 of 18

448

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 10, Issue 2, February-2023

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

vulnerable households during crises can significantly avert negative coping

mechanisms and mitigate rising and compounded vulnerabilities and inequalities

faced by girls and women.

Keywords: COVID-19; household vulnerability; loss of income; risky and negative coping

mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

Restricted movements during COVID–19 pandemic led to reduced economic activities in Kenya.

Many businesses closed down, triggering loss of employment, income and livelihoods for

households. The loss of livelihoods and incomes particularly by poor households exacerbated

poverty and food insecurity thereby heightening vulnerability of the households (Pinchoff,

Austrian, Rajshekhar, et al., 2021) [1]. Residents of informal settlements suffered

disproportionate burdens of losses in employment, income and livelihoods. According to the

Coalition for Women’s Economic Empowerment and Equality (CWEE, 2020) [2], women suffer

disproportionate and heightened vulnerabilities during crises due to their overrepresentation

in the informal sector. Pinchoff, Austrian, Rajshekhar, et al., (2021) also argued that the stress

and disruptions occasioned by COVID-19 had the potential to increase the risk of women and

girls engaging in negative coping mechanisms such as child, early or forced marriage and

exploitative sex. Other risky and negative coping strategies such as begging and hawking also

expose young girls to physical and sexual abuse, and unsafe sexual practices (Ouédraogo,

Ebrima, and Huang (2017)[3]. Other studies (Vinicius et al., 2011[4]; Amendah, Buigut and

Mohamed, 2014[5]) also find that while reduced eating and skipping of meals is a common

coping strategy to food and resource shortages, it leads to under-nutrition which is one of the

underlying causes of illness and death among women and young children in Africa (Burgess

and Danga, 2008)[6]. Eating less for extended periods of time compromises people’s health and

can have negative impacts on the development of children. In the long term, the development

and cognitive effects of under-nutrition among children negatively impact their future ability

to escape the poverty that they were born in (Gikandi, 2020) [7].

Child, early and forced marriage is harmful to girls and young women, and is often associated

with serious forms of violence against women and girls. The vices are an affront to human

dignity and well-being, and an impediment to sustainable development (Puri, 2016) [8]. Child

marriage particularly impedes progression of girls as it deprives them of a number of

opportunities that are important for improving their standards of living (Kapur, 2021) [9].

Transactional sex, among young women has been linked to poor sexual and reproductive health

outcomes. These include unplanned pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and sexually transmitted

infections (Choudhry, Ambresin, Nyakato & Agardh, 2015) [10]. The Sustainable Development

Goal (SDG) number five (5) targets elimination of all harmful practices, such as child, early and

forced marriage, all forms of violence against women and girls both in the public and private

spheres, including sexual and other types of exploitation (United Nations, 2015) [11].

A few studies (Xu, Delius and Pape, 2022[12]; Pinchoff, Austrian, Rajshekhar, et al., 2021; and

Tal and Geraldine, 2020) have been conducted to investigate the socio-economic effects of

COVID-19 and other crises on women and girls. The study by Tal and Geraldine (2020) [13]

was not based on actual experiences in the context of COVID – 19 and did not analyze the coping

mechanisms adopted by girls and women to mitigate effect of income losses due to the

Page 3 of 18

449

Kosimbei, G. K., Omolo, J. O., Rono, G. J., Musyoka, P. K., & Onono, P. A. (2023). Coping Mechanisms to Income Loss by Girls and Women During

COVID-19: Evidence from Selected Informal Settlements in Kenya. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(2). 447-464.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.102.13937

pandemic. Pinchoff, Austrian, Rajshekhar, et al. (2021) sampled prospective longitudinal cohort

of households with adolescent girls from five informal settlements in Nairobi which may not

represent the diverse range of characteristics of households in the informal settlements.

Though Xu, Delius and Pape (2022) analyzed the gender differences in household coping

strategies for COVID-19 in Kenya, it omitted use of risky and negative coping mechanisms by

girls and women to mitigate the income losses. Understanding the use of risky and negative

coping mechanisms adopted by girls and women to mitigate income losses due to COVID-19 is

important in assessing the actual vulnerabilities by the target population to the pandemic.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

This study aimed at establishing the coping mechanisms that girls and women used to contend

with the challenges of loss of incomes due to COVID -19. The purpose was to find out whether

the pandemic had caused heightened vulnerabilities among women and girls through increased

use of risky and negative coping mechanisms.

METHODOLOGY

The study adopted a mixed methods approach combining desk review and cross-sectional

survey of households in four informal settlements. The study sites were Kibra and Mathare

informal settlements in Nairobi City County, and Obunga and Nyawita informal settlements in

Kisumu County. A sample of 400 households was drawn, and an equal allocation applied across

the study sites. Additional primary data was gathered through key informant interviews (KIIs)

and focus group discussions (FGDs). Women only, adolescent girls only, and mixed group FGDs

were conducted in each of the four study sites. The mixed group FGD comprised community

leaders, local administration, youth leaders, women leaders, and People Living with Disabilities

(PLWDs).

A total of 402 households were covered in the survey. One hundred (100) respondents each

were captured in Mathare, Obunga and Nyawita informal settlements while Kibra informal

settlement turned in 102 respondents. Fifteen (15) key informants were captured. They were

from the Ministry of Labour; Ministry of Health; Nairobi City County Government; Kisumu

County Government; National Gender and Equality Commission; United Nations Population

Fund; local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working in the four informal settlements;

and African Medical Research Foundation (AMREF) Health Africa. The women only FGD had a

total of 39 respondents while the adolescent girls only FGD had 38 participants. The mixed

group FGD had 39 respondents, 60 percent of whom were females.

Descriptive and inferential analytical approaches were used in the analysis. Qualitative data

from Key informants and FGDs were transcribed according to questions and issues under

investigation to identify emerging similarities and trends in responses and enable conclusions.

The inferential analysis was based on logistic regression model:

P(y = 1|X|) = F(X

IB) =

e

X

IB

1 + e

XIB

Where y is a binary dummy variable representing the choice of a household in using a specific

coping strategy during COVID-19; X is a vector of household-specific independent variables.