Page 1 of 15
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 10, No. 6.2
Publication Date: June 25, 2023
DOI:10.14738/assrj.106.2.14993.
Jamaludin, N. L., Farradinna, S., & Barna, E. A. (2023). The Role of Gender and Acculturation Attitudes in Predicting the Second- Generation Indonesian Migrants’ Adaptation in Malaysia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(6.2). 01-15.
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
The Role of Gender and Acculturation Attitudes in Predicting the
Second-Generation Indonesian Migrants’ Adaptation in Malaysia
Nor Lelawati Jamaludin
Corresponding Author
norlelawati0019@uitm.edu.my
Faculty of Business and Management UiTM Puncak Alam, Malaysia
Sharifah Farradinna
Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Islam Riau, Riau, Indonesia
Eshaq Ali Barna
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR),
570 Jalan Bukit Petaling, 50460 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
ABSTRACT
The present study's aims were to test second-generation Indonesian migrants'
attitudes toward their home culture and toward host culture as a necessary
component of inclusion for society and to determine whether these acculturation
attitudes (attitudes towards home and host culture) moderate the relationship
between gender and acculturation outcomes (psychological adaptation and
sociocultural adaptation) using a group of N=105 second-generation Indonesians in
Malaysia. Structural Equation Model-AMOS was conducted to test the relationship
among variables. The findings imply that among second-generation Indonesian
migrants, the two fundamental aspects of acculturation attitudes (attitudes towards
home and host culture) were mainly independent. The association between gender
and sociocultural adaption is moderated by acculturation attitudes. The connection
between acculturation attitudes and psychological adaptation was, in turn,
mediated by sociocultural adaptation. The findings also demonstrated that
sociocultural and psychological adaptation each had distinct predictors. Gender
directly predicted psychological adaptation, whereas acculturation attitudes
(attitudes towards home and host culture) directly impacted sociocultural
adaptation.
Keywords: Acculturation attitudes, psychological adaptation, sociocultural adaptation,
mental health, second-generation Indonesian migrants.
INTRODUCTION
Given that migration is a significant aspect of the 21st century and that the evidence suggests
that it still poses both opportunities and challenges for both host and immigrant communities
(UN, 2000:54). Approximately 271.64 million people are currently residing abroad, according
to UN research (Gopinath, & Poornappriya, 2022). This study's focus stems from the realisation
of the significance of second-generation immigrant experiences in getting ready for successful
inclusion. This is due to the fact that many social and governmental programmes have been
Page 2 of 15
2
Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 10, Issue 6.2, June-2023
Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom
motivated by the desire to create bridges between global experiences and knowledge across
borders (Jamaludin et al. 2018; Pitts, 2005). Senator Fulbright's remarks (see Fulbright, 1976),
suggest that inclusion initiatives can have excellent results. However, the full benefits are not
always realised due to different social and psychological impediments (i.e., Loganathan et
al.,2019; Sandhu, 1994). Pitts (2005) further argued that under the worst-case circumstances,
this might escalate global tensions and fuel ethnocentrism on both sides.
The current study looks at two acculturation-related topics. The first one deals with second- generation Indonesians in Malaysia's acculturation attitudes regarding their home and host
cultures as an element of social inclusion. The second concerns the moderating or mediating
function of gender towards the relationship between acculturation attitudes (attitudes towards
home and host culture) and second-generation immigrants' acculturation outcome
(psychological and sociological adaption).
LITERATURE REVIEW
Acculturation Context of Indonesians in Malaysia
According to the current scenario, Indonesia had lots of workers who were both ready and
inexpensively available for Malaysia's industries. The Indonesian community in Malaysia has
expanded in number as a result of a lengthy recruitment period, family reunions, new
marriages, and births, with roughly 40% of members being born in Malaysia.
The majority of the foreign employees in Malaysia, 728,870 in number, are from Indonesia,
according to 2020 data from the Foreign Ministry. India with 114, 455 workers, followed by
Bangladesh with 221,089, Myanmar with 127,705, and Nepal with 405,898 workers. In
addition, Malaysia employs 59,281, 56,153, 29,039, and 15,399 people from Pakistan, the
Philippines, Vietnam, and China, respectively. Thailand, however, employs 12,603 people, while
Sri Lanka has 5,964, Cambodia has 5,103 and Laos has 39 workers.
Most of the second generation is still enrolled in school. However, the general perception of
young immigrants is still depressing; they are frequently linked to crime, separation, and
resistance to change (Hagendoorn, 1991). Despite being spread throughout the nation,
Indonesians tend to congregate in the largest cities. The proximity between families is common.
This is prompted by older Indonesian women's desire to maintain close relationships with one
another and by the need for mutual assistance.
Gender, Acculturation Attitudes (Attitudes Toward Home Culture and Host Culture) and
Adaptation (Psychological and Sociocultural)
According to Jamaludin et al., (2018), home culture is the culture of the country where a person
is born and raised. In contrast, host culture is the culture of the country where a person is
currently living or has lived. Research on how gender affects acculturation attitudes toward
one's home culture and one's host culture has produced a mixed bag of findings.
Luo, et al., (2021); Arora, Metz, & Carlson, (2016) and Akhwan et al., (2021) proposed that an
important factor influencing acculturation attitudes is gender. According to research (Parham
et al., 2015; Liebkind, 1996), women are slower than men to establish identifications with the
host culture and are more assertive of their host culture (Glas, 2021; Ghaffarian, 1987).
Additionally, Fellmeth et al., (2021) and Ryan et al., (2021) noted that females had lower
Page 3 of 15
3
Jamaludin, N. L., Farradinna, S., & Barna, E. A. (2023). The Role of Gender and Acculturation Attitudes in Predicting the Second-Generation
Indonesian Migrants’ Adaptation in Malaysia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(6.2). 01-15.
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.106.2.14993
psychological adaptation than males. Other research, however, found no distinctions between
genders in psychological adaptation (Kolakowsky-Hayner et al.,2021; Furnham & Tresize,
1981; Nwadiora & McAdoo, 1996).
Furthermore, studies on the connection between gender and adaptation have yielded mixed
results. Furnham and Shiekh (1993) discovered that females were more likely than males to
experience psychological issues, experience a relative lack of participation with the host
culture, and have fewer host culture-specific skills. On the other hand, Hashemi, Marzban,
Sebar, and Harris, (2019) found that females were more psychologically adaptable than males.
According to other positive psychology studies, most women believe they are content and
pleased with their lives (see Diener, 2000). Nevertheless, some investigations found no
differences between genders in psychological adaptability (Kolakowsky-Hayner, Goldin,
Kingsley, Alzueta, Arango-Lasprilla, Perrin... & Constantinidou, 2021; Furnham & Tresize, 1981;
Nwadiora & McAdoo, 1996).
The assertion that gender has been reported to be significantly connected with acculturation
attitudes is still inconsistent, according to the literature. The aforementioned makes it very
evident that studies studying the connections between gender and adaptation are likewise
inconsistent. These discrepancies may be caused by weak effects, the omission of significant
moderating variables in the studies, a combination of the two, or both.
Adaptation
Psychological and social adaptability are the two main categories of acculturation outcomes
that have been categorised by acculturation researchers (Ward, Bochner, & Furnham, 2001).
With regard to adaptation, acculturation researchers make a distinction between psychological
and sociocultural adaptation (Schachner, Schiller, Van de Vijver, & Noack, 2014). Psychological
adaptation includes well-being, life satisfaction, and mental health, whereas sociocultural
adaptation refers to an individual’s competence in mastering daily life in a particular cultural
context (Ward, 2001). In this study, mental health was used as an indicator of psychological
adaptation.
Psychological adaptation and sociocultural adaptation have been related, according to some
theories; links between the two have been shown (Berry, 2003; English, Zhang, Stanciu, Kulich,
Zhao, & Bojovic, 2021). Psychological and social adaptation results were found to be positively
associated by Ward and Kennedy (1999). Additionally, it was discovered that the degree of
cultural proximity and integration into the social host environment were positively correlated
with the intensity of the link between psychological and sociocultural adaptation (Kanj, &
Khamis, 2021; Ward, 1999; Ward & Kennedy, 1996; Ward, Okura, Kennedy, & Kojima, 1998;
Ward & Rana-Deuba, 1999).
Acculturation Attitudes (Attitudes Toward Home Culture and Host Culture) and
Adaptation (Psychological and Sociocultural)
Inconsistent findings have been found in research on the relationship between attitudes toward
home and host cultures and adaptation, which appears to focus mostly on psychological
adaptation as an outcome variable. Stronger ties to the host culture were shown by Singh
(1999) and Xiao, Miao, & Sarkar, (2021) to be associated with higher levels of stress, while
Padilla (1986) and English, Zhang, & Tong, (2021) found that they were associated with lower