Boundary Between Art and Pornography: Differences in Image Identification Between Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence

Authors

  • Rain Chen Department of Visual Communication Design, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C
  • Hsiu-Ching Lu Department of Styling and Cosmetology, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1110.17712

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, image works, infringement analysis, image identification

Abstract

This study examined whether Microsoft Azure and human participants differed significantly in their judgment of controversial image content (e.g., adult and violent content). Significant differences were observed between the Azure- and participant-awarded scores on all four indexes—Adult, Racy, Gore, and Event Description. The artificial intelligence made stricter judgments than did the participants. The introduction of artificial intelligence may facilitate the efficient judgment of images by website administrators. However, the standards upheld by artificial intelligence appear to be unique and stricter than those upheld by people. In the short term, the boundary between art and pornography may remain difficult to identify. Assessing the difference in judgments between artificial and human intelligence should be a topic of continual concern.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-19

How to Cite

Chen, R., & Lu, H.-C. (2024). Boundary Between Art and Pornography: Differences in Image Identification Between Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(10), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1110.17712

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 10 (2024): Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Rain Chen, Hsiu-Ching Lu

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.