Page 1 of 8

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal – Vol. 12, No. 1

Publication Date: January 25, 2025

DOI:10.14738/assrj.121.18121.

Zhang, J. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Course Learning. Advances in Social Sciences

Research Journal, 12(1). 11-18.

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

Generative AI in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities

for Course Learning1

Jinbao Zhang

Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

ABSTRACT

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming course learning in higher

education. This study, based on two rounds of action research in two college

courses, reveals critical challenges in this transformation. Findings indicate that

students' reliance on GenAI can hinder their autonomy, critical thinking, and

affective-social learning, while also raising concerns about content accuracy,

intellectual property rights, and privacy. Although teacher guidance partially

mitigates these issues, enhanced strategies are crucial. This study provides

practical implications for optimizing curriculum design, teaching methods, and

evaluation criteria, emphasizing the need to incorporate ethics education and

strengthen emotional-social guidance. Future research directions are suggested to

address the challenges of GenAI and ensure educational quality and student

development.

Keywords: Generative Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Course Learning,

Challenges, Ethical Concerns, Teaching Strategies, Student Development.

INTRODUCTION

Generative AI is rapidly changing education, presenting both opportunities and challenges

(Tariq, 2024; Batta, 2024). Its ability to generate content has significant implications for

teaching and learning (Mittal, Sai, & Chamola, 2024), impacting code writing (Gottlander &

Khademi, 2023), humanities assignments (Kumar et al., 2023; Hutson, 2025), and personalized

feedback (George, 2023; Guettala et al., 2024).

However, concerns remain about its potential impact on student learning, ethics, and social

skills (Hoernig et al., 2024). While some research suggests AI can enhance learning (Hooda et

al., 2022), others caution against over-reliance (Aymen & Zakarya, 2024). Ethical

considerations, such as intellectual property and data privacy, are also paramount (Kong, Li, &

Zhang, 2024).

This study addresses existing research gaps by examining GenAI's application in two university

courses: "Computational Thinking and Social Sciences" and "Modern Educational Technology."

Using action research, the study analyzes AI's influence on learning, ethics, and social skills,

aiming to provide a comprehensive understanding of its role in higher education.

1 This research was funded by the Key Project of Beijing Social Science Fund in 2019, 'Research on Social Science Issues

of Artificial Intelligence and Its Educational Practice' (Grant No. 19JYA002).

Page 2 of 8

12

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 12, Issue 01, January-2025

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

LITERATURE REVIEW

Generative AI (GAI) is rapidly gaining traction in education, particularly in college courses.

While it offers promising potential, it also presents challenges that necessitate careful

consideration.

Current Applications and Benefits

GAI is being used in higher education to enhance teaching and personalize learning (Guettala

et al., 2024). It can increase student engagement, improve test scores, and accelerate skill

development (Guettala et al., 2024). Additionally, GAI provides educators with innovative tools

and resources for course design, enriching the learning experience (Moundridou et al., 2024).

When used effectively, GAI can increase teacher productivity and enhance instructional

capabilities (MacDowell et al., 2024).

Challenges and Concerns

Despite its potential benefits, GAI presents several challenges:

• Technology Dependence: Over-reliance on GAI can hinder students' independent

thinking and problem-solving abilities (Le-Nguyen & Tran, 2024; Shah & Asad, 2024).

• Content Accuracy: GAI-generated content may contain misinformation or biases due to

limitations in training data and algorithms (Ozbay & Alatas, 2020).

• Ethical Issues: The use of GAI raises concerns about intellectual property infringement

and data privacy breaches (Shukla et al., 2022; Vaza et al., 2024).

• Social and Emotional Impact: Excessive GAI use may negatively affect students' social

interactions and teamwork skills (Wach et al., 2023).

Addressing the Challenges

Researchers propose several strategies to mitigate these challenges:

• Digital Literacy: Educators need to strengthen students' digital literacy skills to help

them critically evaluate and use GAI responsibly (Kazanidis & Pellas, 2024; Cha et al.,

2024).

• Critical Thinking: Students should be encouraged to think critically about GAI- generated content and verify information using reliable sources (Hammer, 2024;

Holmes et al., 2023).

• Ethical Guidelines: Educational institutions must establish clear ethical guidelines and

norms for GAI use to promote responsible and ethical practices (Holmes et al., 2023;

Kasneci et al., 2023).

This study aims to build upon existing research by investigating the practical applications of

GAI in college courses, its impact on student learning, and strategies for addressing ethical

concerns.

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

This study examines the impact of generative AI on higher education, focusing on technology

dependence, ethical issues, and assessment, through a multidisciplinary lens (Chiu, 2023). The

theoretical framework integrates:

• Educational Technology: The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Davis, 1989) is

used to analyze factors influencing students' AI adoption. The study also examines

Page 3 of 8

13

Zhang, J. (2025). Generative AI in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Course Learning. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal,

12(1). 11-18.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.121.18121

technology dependence, echoing the concept of "AI literacy" (Zawacki-Richter et al.,

2023), where students must critically evaluate AI tools.

• Social Cognitive Theory (SCT): Bandura's (1997) theory of self-efficacy is used to

explore how AI affects students' confidence. The study also analyzes students' outcome

expectations related to AI use.

• Ethics: The study addresses academic integrity concerns, such as plagiarism and

cheating, raised by AI use (Yi, 2021). It also examines potential intellectual property

issues.

• Constructivist Learning Theory: Drawing on constructivism (Hein, 1991), the study

investigates how AI impacts students' knowledge construction process.

Based on this framework, the study proposes hypotheses regarding technology dependence,

academic integrity, assessment, and knowledge construction. It suggests that self-efficacy and

outcome expectations influence AI dependence, with potential implications for academic

integrity. AI use may also necessitate changes in assessment methods. Finally, the study

recognizes the dual impact of AI on knowledge construction, acknowledging its potential to

both promote and hinder deep learning.

The study aims to test these hypotheses through action research and provide recommendations

for the ethical and effective integration of generative AI in higher education.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This study employs an action research approach (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988) to investigate

the impact of generative AI on college course learning. This method emphasizes a cyclical

process of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting, allowing for continuous improvement

throughout the research.

Focus Areas

The study focuses on several key areas:

• Technology Dependence: Examining whether students over-rely on generative AI,

potentially hindering their independent learning and critical thinking skills.

• Social Cognitive Impact: Analyzing how generative AI affects students' self-efficacy and

outcome expectations in the learning process.

• Ethical Considerations: Investigating potential ethical dilemmas related to academic

integrity and intellectual property rights when using generative AI.

• Assessment Impact: Exploring how generative AI influences teachers' ability to

accurately assess student learning and understanding.

Research Subjects

The study involves undergraduate students enrolled in two courses at a university:

"Computational Thinking and Social Sciences" (third-year students) and "Modern Educational

Technology" (first-year students). These courses were selected for their distinct student

populations, allowing for a comprehensive examination of how different student groups engage

with generative AI.

Rationale for Course Selection:

• "Computational Thinking and Social Sciences": Third-year students in this course may

Page 4 of 8

14

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 12, Issue 01, January-2025

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

have a higher tendency to over-rely on AI tools due to their focus on problem-solving

and research.

• "Modern Educational Technology": First-year students in this course are likely to have

a more basic understanding of AI and its capabilities, potentially leading to misuse.

Research Process

The study was conducted in two rounds of action research, each involving problem

identification, subject selection, research design, implementation, and reflection and analysis.

Data collection methods included classroom observation, assignment analysis, and student

interviews.

ANALYSIS OF ISSUES

This section analyzes key issues observed in the study concerning students' use of generative

AI in the two courses.

Technology Dependence and Deviation from Learning Principles

Students in both courses exhibited a strong reliance on generative AI, confirming the

hypothesis that students tend to depend on such technology.1 They often sought answers

directly from AI instead of engaging in independent thinking and utilizing their knowledge base.

This over-reliance reflects a neglect of developing essential learning skills and aligns with the

hypothesis that students with low self-efficacy are more prone to AI dependence.

Variances:

• Degree and Scenarios: Third-year students in "Computational Thinking and Social

Sciences" showed greater dependence when applying professional knowledge,

reflecting their lower self-efficacy and desire for quick solutions to complex tasks. First- year students in "Modern Educational Technology" relied heavily on AI across all tasks,

indicating a lack of active learning habits and a desire for shortcuts.

• Impact Focus: Over-reliance on AI hindered the development of critical thinking and

problem-solving skills in third-year students, while first-year students struggled with

independent program design, highlighting the negative impact of AI dependence on

professional competence.

Content Accuracy and Ethical Concerns

Both courses encountered issues with the accuracy of AI-generated content and related ethical

concerns, linking to academic integrity considerations. Students often used inaccurate

information without verification, potentially leading to unintentional academic dishonesty.

Additionally, they demonstrated a weak awareness of ethical issues like intellectual property

and privacy protection, highlighting the risk of violating academic norms when using AI.

Variances:

• Course Content: In "Computational Thinking and Social Sciences," inaccurate

information and ethical oversights in assignments and projects revealed the potential

for AI to negatively impact research validity. In "Modern Educational Technology,"

issues included inaccurate information about emerging technologies and the use of

copyrighted materials, demonstrating that AI challenges manifest differently across

disciplines.

Page 6 of 8

16

Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal (ASSRJ) Vol. 12, Issue 01, January-2025

Services for Science and Education – United Kingdom

• Teaching Methods: Provide practical guidance on using AI, incorporating case studies

and group discussions to enhance critical evaluation and social interaction.

• Assessment: Develop comprehensive evaluation criteria that consider the influence of

AI on student work, focusing on understanding and application of knowledge.

• Social-Emotional Learning: Encourage active learning and social interaction through

group activities and projects, fostering collaboration and emotional well-being.

• Ethical Integration: Embed ethical considerations throughout the curriculum,

emphasizing intellectual property, privacy, and responsible AI use.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on developing targeted interventions, such as educational toolkits

and modules, to cultivate critical thinking and digital ethics in students using generative AI.

Exploring technological solutions for monitoring and guiding AI use can also enhance

responsible application and improve assessment accuracy.

Further investigation into the disciplinary nuances of AI application is crucial. Examining how

different fields engage with AI can inform tailored pedagogical strategies and promote effective

integration across diverse learning contexts.

By addressing these challenges and pursuing further research, educators can harness the

potential of generative AI while mitigating its risks, ultimately fostering a more effective and

ethical learning environment for students.

References

1. Aguilera-Hermida, A. P. (2024). AI Chatbots in Education: The Importance of Accuracy. In International

Forum of Teaching & Studies, 20(1).

2. Aymen, D. I. F., & Zakarya, B. O. U. S. I. O. U. D. (2024). The Influence of Artificial Intelligence on Students'

Critical Thinking (Doctoral dissertation, university center of abdalhafid boussouf-MILA).

3. Baron, J. V. (2024). A Double-Edged Sword: Examining the Link between Students’ Dependence on Artificial

Intelligence (AI) and their Psychosocial Maturity. TWIST, 19(3), 339-344.

4. Batta, A. (2024). Transforming Higher Education Through Generative AI: Opportunity and Challenges.

Paradigm, 09718907241286221.

5. Cha, Y., Dai, Y., Lin, Z., Liu, A., & Lim, C. P. (2024). Empowering university educators to support generative AI- enabled learning: Proposing a competency framework. Procedia CIRP, 128, 256-261.

6. Chiu, T. K. (2023). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in

education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-17.

7. Chiu, T. K. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI.

Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100197.

8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking

Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205, 219.

9. George, A. S. (2023). The Potential of Generative AI to Reform Graduate Education. Partners Universal

International Research Journal, 2(4), 36-50.