Context-dependent emotional empathy in virtual reality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.54.4514Keywords:
Emotional empathy, virtual reality, context, gender, immersionAbstract
Empathy has been typically studied by means of paradigms including static representations of socially relevant stimuli and it has been acknowledged that there is need for more ecologically valid, dynamic measures. The present study aimed to study implicit (‘arousal’) and explicit (‘concern’) emotional empathy in response to positive and negative emotional stories in three virtual reality settings in males and females (N=39). It was hypothesized that emotional stories would elicit less arousal or implicit emotional empathy in a nature environment compared to a more urbanized environment. Males were hypothesized to score in general lower on empathy measures. Findings showed that emotional empathy was context-dependent and independent of gender. While it has been shown that environmental presence matters when it comes to emotional empathy, the explanation why this specific behavioral pattern was observed still needs to be clarified and suggestions to extend and improve the Virtual Reality Empathy Paradigm have been suggested.
References
Decety, J. and P.L. Jackson, A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Pyschological Science, 2006. 15(2): p. 54-58.
Decety, J., Dissecting the neural mechanisms mediating empathy. Emotion review, 2011. 3(1): p. 92-108.
Gyurak, A., J.J. Gross, and A. Etkin, Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A dual-process framework. Cognitive and emotion, 2011. 25(3): p. 400-412.
Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., The Neural Bases for Empathy. The Neuroscientist, 2011. 17(1): p. 18-24.
Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., J. Aharon-Peretz, and D. Perry, Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 2009. 132: p. 617-627.
Cox, C.L., et al., The balance between feeling and knowing: affective and cognitive empathy are reflected in the brain's intrinsic functional dynamics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2012. 7(6): p. 727-737.
Dziobek, I., et al., Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using in the multifaceted empathy test. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2008. 38: p. 464-473.
Maurage, P., et al., Dissociation Between Affective and Cognitive Empathy in Alcoholism: A Specific Deficit for the Emotional Dimension. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 2011. 35(9): p. 1662-1668.
Baron-Cohen, S., et al., The 'reading the mind in the eyes' test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 2001. 42(2): p. 241-251.
Lang, P.J., et al., Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 1993. 30(3): p. 261-273.
Dziobek, I., Comment: Towards a More Ecologically Valid Assessment of Empathy. Emotion Review, 2012. 4(1): p. 18-19.
Risko, E.F., et al., Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2012. 6: p. 143.
Dziobek, I., et al., Introducing MASC: a movie for the assessment of social cognition. J Autism Dev Disord, 2006. 36(5): p. 623-36.
Kuypers, K.P.C., Emotional empathic responses to dynamic negative affective stimuli is gender-dependent. Frontiers in Psychology, Emotion Science, 2017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01491.
Blascovich, J., et al., Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodologial tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry: An international journal for the advancement of psychological theory, 2002. 13(2): p. 103-124.
Gillath, O., et al., What can virtual reality teach us about prosocial tendencies in real and virtual environments? Media Psychology, 2008. 11(2): p. 259-282.
Toppenberg, H.L., et al., HIV-related stigma in social interactions: Approach and avoidance behaviour in a virtual environment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2015. 45(2): p. 169-179.
Hatfield, E., J.T. Cacioppo, and R.L. Rapson, Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1993. 2(3): p. 96-100.
Hanich, J., et al., Why we like to watch sad films. The pleasure of being moved in aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2014. 8(2): p. 130.
Schieman, S. and H.A. Turner, "When Feeling Other People's Pain Hurts": The Influence of Psychosocial Resources on the Association between Self-Reported Empathy and Depressive Symptoms. Social Psychology Quarterly, 2001. 64(4): p. 376-389.
Ulrich, R.S., et al., Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1991. 11(3): p. 201-230.
Hartig, T., et al., Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1996. 37(4): p. 378-393.
Brody, L.R. and J. Hall, Gender and emotion in context, in Handbook of Emotion, M. Lewis, J.M. Haviland-Jones, and L.F. Barrett, Editors. 2008, The Guidlford Press: New York. p. 395-408.
Reniers, R.L.E.P., et al., The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2011. 93(1): p. 84-95.
Mestre, M.V., et al., Are women more empathic than men? A longitudinal study in adolescence. The Spanish journal of psychology, 2009. 12(1): p. 76-83.
Wright, D.B. and E.M. Skagerberg, Measuring Empathizing and Systemizing with a Large US Sample. PLoS One, 2012. 7(2).
Baron-Cohen, S., et al., The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B Biological sciences, 2003. 358: p. 361-374.
Kret, M.E. and B. De Gelder, A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals. Neuropsychologia, 2012. 50(7): p. 1211-1221.
Christov-Moore, L., et al., Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2014. 46, Part 4: p. 604-627.
Hurlemann, R., et al., Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in humans. The journal of neuroscience, 2010. 30(14): p. 4999-5007.
Bradley, M.M. and P.J. Lang, Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1994. 25(1): p. 49-59.
Davis, M.H., Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of personalilty and social psychology 1983. 44: p. 113-126.
De Corte, K., et al., Measuring empathic tendencies: Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the interpersonal reactivity index. Psychologica Belgica, 2007. 47: p. 235-260.
Claridge, G. and A. McDonald, An investigation into the relationships between convergent and divergent thinking, schizotypy, and autistic traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 2009. 46: p. 794-799.
Groen, Y., et al., The Empathy and Systemizing Quotient: The Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version and a Review of the Cross-Cultural Stability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2015. 45(9): p. 2848-2864.
Anttonen, J. and V. Surakka, Emotions and heart rate while sitting on a chair, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems2005, ACM: Portland, Oregon, USA. p. 491-499.
Detenber, B.H., R.F. Simons, and G.G. Bennett, Roll ‘em!: The effects of picture motion on emotional responses. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 1998. 42(1): p. 113-127.
Greenwald, M.K., E.W. Cook, and P.J. Lang, Affective judgement and psychophysiological response: dimensional covariation in the evaluation of pictorial stimuli. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1989. 3: p. 51-64.
Montero-López, E., et al., A virtual reality approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: Contrasting two distinct protocols. Behavior Research Methods, 2016. 48(1): p. 223-232.
Becker, H. and D. Sands, The relationship of empathy to clinical experience among male and female nursing students. J Nurs Educ, 1988. 27(5): p. 198-203.
Kennedy, B., K. Curtis, and D. Waters, Is there a relationship between personality and choice of nursing specialty: an integrative literature review. BMC Nursing, 2014. 13(1): p. 40.
Ekman, P., R.W. Levenson, and W.V. Friesen, Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. Science, 1983. 221(4616): p. 1208-10.
Jack, R.E., et al., Four not six: Revealing culturally common facial expressions of emotion. J Exp Psychol Gen, 2016. 145(6): p. 708-30.
Felnhofer, A., et al., Physical and social presence in collaborative virtual environments: Exploring age and gender differences with respect to empathy. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014. 31: p. 272-279.
Prendinger, H. and M. Ishizuka, The empathic companion: A character-based interface that addresses users'affective states. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 2005. 19(3-4): p. 267-285.
Mauss, I.B. and M.D. Robinson, Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition & emotion, 2009. 23(2): p. 209-237.
Fukushima, H., Y. Terasawa, and S. Umeda, Association between interoception and empathy: Evidence from heartbeat-evoked brain potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2011. 79(2): p. 259-265.
Georgi, E., F. Petermann, and M. Schipper, Are empathic abilities learnable? Implications for social neuroscientific research from psychometric assessments. Social Neuroscience, 2014. 9(1): p. 74-81.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
