STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF SYNCHRONOUS SESSIONS WITHIN ONLINE COURSES IN HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.57.4883Keywords:
Online courses, Synchronous components, Blended learning, Higher educationAbstract
The number of students taking online courses has increased significantly. Helping students be successful in this format is very important. Previous studies have attempted to identify the difficulties that have hindered student academic progress the online environment. Adding a synchronous component to an online course is one method that has been discussed as a way to help students be more successful in online courses. This study sought to answer two research questions: 1. How important do students feel synchronous sessions are to their mastery of online content? and 2. What activities within the synchronous sessions do students feel are the most beneficial? Through email, 200 graduate students in 6 different education programs from a Catholic, Liberal Arts University were invited to participate in an online survey. Participants were asked to rate the importance of online synchronous sessions and their various possible characteristics. Results indicated graduate students found the synchronous online sessions are an important addition to the online course. They also indicated that the content of the sessions was the most important consideration. When structuring synchronous sessions, the participants indicated that instructors should focus on explaining assignments, simplifying content, adding additional content, and supporting group work.
References
References
Allen, E. & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
Allen, E. & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States 2009. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education in the United States, 2008. Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/survey_report/2008-staying-course-online-education-united-states/
Barbour, M. K., McLaren, A., & Zhang, L. (2012). It’s not that tough: Students speak about their online learning experience. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 226-241.
Ciabocchi, E., Ginsberg, A., & Picciano, A. (2016). A study of faculty governance leaders’ perception of online and blended learning. Online Learning, 20(3), 53-73. Retrieved from https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/974
Conrad, D. (2002, spring). Deep in the heart of learners: Insights into the nature of online community. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 1-19.
Dreyer, C., Bangeni, N., & Nel, C. (2005). A framework for supporting students studying English via a mixed-mode delivery system. In B. Holmberg, M. Shelley, & C. White (Eds.), Distance education and languages: Evolution and change (pp. 92-118). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.
Graham, C. R. (2005). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham, The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local Designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Jo, I., Kim, D., & Yoon, M. (2015). Constructing proxy variables to measure adult learners’ time management strategies in LMS. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 214-225.
Negash, S., Wilcox, M. V., & Emerson, M. (2007). Synchronous hybrid e-learning: Teaching complex information systems classes online. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 3(3), 1-13.
Nielson, K. & González-Lloret, M. (2010). Effective Online Foreign Language Courses: Theoretical Framework and Practical Applications. The Eurocall Review, 17, 27-35.
Oblender, T. (2002). A hybrid course model: One solution to the high online drop-out rate. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(6), 42–46.
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Petrides, L. A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29 (1), 69–77.
Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33 (2), 162–177.
Putman, S., Ford, K., & Tancock, S. (2012). Redefining online discussions: Using participant stances to promote collaboration and cognitive engagement. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 151-167.
Schrum, L. (2002). Oh, what wonders you will see: Distance education past, present, and future. Learning and Leading with Technology, 30 (3), 6–9, 20–21.
Tunison, S. & Noonan, B. (2001). On-line learning: secondary students’ first experience. Canadian Journal of Education. 26 (4). pp. 495-511. Retrieved from http://www.csse.ca/CJE/Articles/FullText/CJE26-4/CJE26-4-Tunison.pdf
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
