RELATIONSHIP ANALYSIS ICARE-ORIENTED STUDENTS WORKSHEET DEVELOPMENT WITH LEARNING STYLES TO IMPROVE LEARNING OUTCOMES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.59.5204

Keywords:

Development ICARE, Learning Outcomes, Learning Styles

Abstract

This study is the first year of three years. This study aims to describe the relationship of the development of teaching materials to learning styles in improving learning outcomes. The type of research used in the entire study is Research and Development (R & D). Research subjects are lecturers and Students in Basic of Mathematics and Sciences Group. The first year's study contains the need assessment, and the drafting of the initial draft of textbooks for high school physics courses with ICARE-oriented Students Worksheet. Data collection techniques used were questionnaire, observation, interview, and documentation study, and supported by logbooks and focus group discussion (FGD). The results shown in the development of the device indicate that the development of ICARE-based teaching materials is not influenced and does not have a significant relationship in one of the learning styles.

References

Al-arfaj, M. (2016). Physics Achievement from the Perspective of Learning Style Preferences. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2016/20259

Ali, A. H., Nur, S., & Rubani, K. (2009). Student-Centered Learning : an Approach in Physics Learning Style Using Problem-Based Learning ( Pbl ). Heritage, (November).

Cassidy, S. (2004). Learning Styles : An overview of theories , models , and measures, 24(4).

Dekan FMIPA Unimed. (2017). Pengantar Dekan: Rapat Kerja Dosen FMIPA Semester Genap Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Medan: Medan

DePorter, Bobbi & Hernacki, Mike. (2001). Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J.O. (2009). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Boston: Pearson.

Duckett, B. I., & Tatarkowski, M. (n.d.). effective practice Learning styles and their application for effective learning.

Felder, R. M., & Henriques, E. R. (1995). Learning and Teaching Styles In Foreign and Second Language Education, (1), 21–31.

Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg, W.R. (2007). Educational Research. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Gustafson, K. L., & Branc, R.M. (2002). Survey of Instructional Development Models New York: ERLC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology.

Husain, D. (2000). LEARNING AND PERSONALITY STYLES Gaya belajar dan gaya kepribadian dalam, 118–122.

Majid, A., & Rochman, C., (2013). Pendekatan Ilmiah dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2014. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Mazlan, A. N., Harun, J., & Zainuddin, Z. A. (2012). Review on the Effectiveness of the Technology Learning Materials in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 37, 174–178.

Motlan, Sinuraya, J., & Tarigan, R. (2012). Penerapan Metode Inkuiri Berbasis Blended Learning (Laporan Penelitian Guru Besar dan Doktor Sesuai Keahlian).

NSES. (1996). National Science Education Standard, Washington, DC: National Academy Press

Pannen, P. 2001. Penulisan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: PAU-PPAI, Universitas Terbuka

Poerwati, L., & Amri, S., (2013). Panduan Memahami Kurikulum 2013, Sebuah Inovasi Struktur Kurikulum Penunjang Masa Depan. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher

Restami, M. P., Suma, K., & Pujani, M. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran POE (Predict-Observe Explaint) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Fisika dan Sikap Ilmiah Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Sisiwa. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA, 3.

Sadler-smith, E., & Riding, R. (1999). Cognitive style and instructional preferences, 162691, 355–371.

Sadler-smith, E. (1996). Learning styles : a holistic approach, 29–36.

Salyers, V., Carter, L., Barrett, P., Williams, L. (2010). Evaluating Student and Faculty Satisfaction with a Pedagogical Framework. Journal of Distance Education, Vol 24, no 3. AU Press, Athabasca University.

Sastromiharjo, A., & Pd, M. (2008). MEDIA DAN SUMBER PEMBELAJARAN, 1–13.

Sinuraya, J. (2004), Penerapan Model Pembelajaran CTL dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika Dasar I Bagi Mahasiswa Jurusan Fisika FMIPA Universitas Negeri Medan, Laporan Teaching Grant Dana Semi Que V, Medan, FMIPA Universitas Negeri Medan.

Sinuraya, J., Simatupang, S., & Wahyuni, I. (2014). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Peningkatan Capaian Kompetensi Fisika Umum II Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Fisika FMIPA Universitas Negeri Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3 (1), 24-33.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta

Sungkono, et.al. (2003). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Yogyakarta: FIP UNY.

Trianto, (2008). Mendesain Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning di Kelas). Jakarta: Cerdas Pustaka Publisher.

Uno, H. B. (2008). Orientasi Baru dalam Psikologi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara

Wahyudin, D. (2010). Model Pembelajaran ICARE pada Kurikulum Mata Pelajaran TIK di SMP (ICARE based Instructional Model on ICT Curriculum in Yunior Secondary School). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol. 11, No. 1, April 2010. UPI: Bandung.

Wahyudin, D. & Susilana, R. (2012). Kurikulum & Pembelajaran: Inovasi Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Zajacova, B. (2013). Learning Styles in Physics Education: Introduction of Our Research Tools and Design. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1786–1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.201

Downloads

Published

2018-10-01

How to Cite

Sinuraya, J., Panggabean, D. D., & Wahyuni, I. (2018). RELATIONSHIP ANALYSIS ICARE-ORIENTED STUDENTS WORKSHEET DEVELOPMENT WITH LEARNING STYLES TO IMPROVE LEARNING OUTCOMES. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.59.5204

Most read articles by the same author(s)