THE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ROLES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER BASED TEST – NATIONAL EXAMINATION IN EAST ACEH, ACEH, INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.62.5877Keywords:
Computer based Test (CBT), National Examination, Schools and Education, IndonesiaAbstract
The purpose of this study is to find out to what extent school administration in East Aceh administered the CBT-NE are ready for accepting Computer Based National Examination (CBNE) in terms of its objective, infrastructure and human resource management, budget allocated management and management of examination. This study employed a qualitative case study approach consisting of three schools from three distinct categories such as general secondary school, secondary boarding school and vocational school in East Aceh District. All the selective schools have implemented the CBT-NE system for students. For collecting data, the researcher conducted interviews with the selected schools’ principals. The research findings report on the variety of preparation that these three schools had taken in implementing CBNE. In terms of infrastructure and human resource management, they followed the instruction provided by the Ministry of Education, Indonesia, while there is also additional equipment that they prepared as well to maintain the electric supply. Moreover, schools got both financial and non-financial supports from the government that allocated to purchase and repair the computer, and honorarium in CBT-NE in their schools. In terms of management role, the schools conducted training for students and teachers to manage the session and community involvement in conducting CBNE.
References
Akdemir, O., & Oguz, A. (2008). Computer-based testing: An alternative for the assessment of Turkish undergraduate students. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1198-1204.
Baswedan, A.R. (2015). Kebijakan Perubahan Ujian Nasional. (Power Point Slide). Retrieved from: http://kemdikbud.go.id/kemdikbud/dokumen/un2015/UjianNasional2015Konpers%20Mendikbud.pdf
Baumer, M., Roded, K., & Gafni, N. (2009). Assessing the equivalence of Internet-based vs. paper-and-pencil psychometric tests. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009 GMAC Conference on Computerized Adaptive Testing.
Butler, D. & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning. Educause Quarterly, 2, 22–28.
Harmiyuni, & Sailan, M. (2016). Persepsi Siswa Tentang Pelaksanaan Ujian Nasional Berbasis Komputer Di SMK Komputer Mutiara Ilmu Makassar. Jurnal Tomalebbi, (2), 36-42
Jamil, M., Tariq, R.H., & Shami, P.A. (2012). Computer-Based VS Paper-Based Examinations: Perceptions of University Teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 11(4), 371-381
Joshua, M. T., & Ikiroma, B. (2012). Computer-Based testing in Nigeria's university entrants' matriculation examination: Readiness and acceptability of critical stake-holder. Retrieved from http://www.iaea.info/documents/paper_371f29eed.pdf
Kemendikbu RI. (2015). Ujian Nasional Berbasis Komputer. Retrieved from http://unbk.kemdikbud.go.id/
Kemendikbu RI. (2016). Buku Saku UN. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nasional Repulik Indonesia.
Kemendikbu RI. (2016). Ujian Nasional Berbasis Komputer. Retrieved from http://ubk.kemdikbud.go.id/
Kuzmina, I. P. (2010). Computer-based testing: advantages and disadvantages. Journal NTU-KPI. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, (1), 2010-1.
Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Standar Pengelolaan Pendidikan Oleh Satuan Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah. Indonesia: Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2007
Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Standar Tenaga Administrasi Sekolah/Madrasah. Indonesia: Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2008.
Millsap, C. M. (2000). Comparison of computer testing versus traditional paper-and- pencil testing. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of North Texas, Texas
Nurfuadah, R.N. (2014). Ujian Nasional dari Masa ke Masa. Okezone News. Retrieved from http://news.okezone.com/read/2014/12/30/65/1085698/ujian-nasional-dari-masa-ke-masa
Olson, T. (2013). Utilizing Online Exams and Human Resources to Improve Student Learning and Minimizing Academic Dishonesty-Finds From Large Section Deployment. In International Conference on e-Learning (p. 321). Academic Conferences International Limited.
Piaw, C. Y. (2011). Comparisons between computer-based testing and paper-pencil testing: Testing effect test scores testing time and testing motivation. In Proceedings of The Informatics Conference (pp. 1-9).
Werhner, M. J. (2010). A comparison of the performance of online versus traditional on-campus earth science students on identical exams. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(5), 310-312.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.