Context and Erection of Legal System in Ghana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.22.770Keywords:
Context, Erection, Legal System, Socio-economic, Trade motive, Restructuring.Abstract
The paper has analyzed the erection of the formal legal system in Ghana. The research based its analysis on relevant textual and field materials, including observation. The finding has shown that socio-economic context of the colonial period has frame-worked the legal system Ghana inherited from the British. For example, the British have seen the courts as the appropriate way of dealing with cases associated with trade and resentment of local people at the sharp deals of their merchants. The erection of the legal system helped the British assume a broader and more lasting political control in the trading posts to defend and protect their merchants. Today, Ghana faces new challenges. To overcome them, Ghana needs to erect and enforce new laws that are contextually relevant to meet and direct the ongoing socio-economic processes. It means a restructuring and reforming the entire inherited colonial legal system. The study is important because, among other things, it has highlighted the context of the British colonial era which frame-worked the formal legal system in Ghana which needs contextualization to meet present realities for a more desirable micro and macro socio-economic transformation.
References
• Acquah, G.K. (2006) “The Judicial Role of the Chief in Democratic Governance”, in I.K. Odotei and A.K. Awedoba (eds), Chieftaincy in Ghana: Culture, Governance and Development: 65-79. Accra: Sub-Saharan Publishers.
• Bennion, F.A.R. (1962) The Constitutional Law of Ghana. London: Butterworth.
• Benton, L. (2002) Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chanock, M. (1998) Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gedzi, V.S. (2009) Principles and Practices of Dispute Resolution in Ghana: Ewe and Akan Procedures on Females’ Inheritance and Property Rights. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing B.V.
• Merry, S.E. (1988) “Legal Pluralism.” Law and Society Review 22(55): 869-96.
• Moore, S.F. (1986a) Social Facts and Fabrications: ‘Customary’ Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Okoth-Ogendo, H.W.O. (1979) “The Imposition of Property Law in Kenya.” In Sandra B. Burma and Barbara E. Harrel-Bond (eds.). The Imposition of Law: 147-166. New York: Academic Press.
• Pospisil, L. (1971) The Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory of Law. New York: Harper and Row.
• Ranger, T. (1983) “The Invention of Tradition in Colonial Africa.” In Eric Hobsbawn and
Terence Ranger (eds.), The Invention of Tradition: 1-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Selznick, P. (2003) “‘Law in Context’ in Context Revisited.”Journal of Law and Society. Vol. 30, No.2: 177-186.
• Yeboa, K.Y. (October 1998) ‘The History of the Ghana Legal System: The Evolution of a Unified National System of Courts’, in R.A. Atuguba and F.S. Tsikata (eds), Materials for Ghana Legal System (FLAW 201) (For Students of the Faculty of Law, University of Ghana), Vol. 1: 311-34.
• Ziegert, K. (1998) “A Note on Eugen Erhlich and the Production of Legal Knowledge”. Sydney Law Review: 1-17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
