Researching Practises of Risk: Inside the social work office
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.12.80Abstract
Very little research has been conducted on how statutory social workers undertake their risk investigations into alleged child abuse. Moreover, very little research has explored the risk discourses as utilised and understood by social workers. For my doctoral work, I set out to learn from child welfare workers as they ‘talked’ about risk, to hear the inconsistencies and hesitations about ‘risk’ within their working practises. A qualitative research strategy was designed, and this paper overviews that design and reflects on my research experience. This research strategy became my whare (traditional Maori tribal meeting house), my methodological house, where I drew strength in times of intellectual strain, and where I rested, as I undertook and successfully completed doctoral work. This paper is my methodological account of researching practises of risk within child welfare settings in Aotearoa/ New Zealand, something I struggled to locate in the literature as a beginning doctoral student.
References
Author, (2004). Maximising risk in child protection: A response to Morley. Social Work Review, XVI(1), 9-12.
Author, (2006). Risk Estimation System; Social Work Review
Alston, M., & Bowles, W. (1998). Research for social workers: An introduction to methods. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Batty, L. P. (2002). Assisted reproductive technology: The Aotearoa/New Zealand policy context. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
Bolton, R. (1996). Coming home: The journey of a gay ethnographer in the years of the plague. In E. Lewin & W. Leap (Eds.), Out in the field: Reflections of lesbian and gay anthropologists (pp. 147-168). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Byrne, M. (2001). Critical Incident Technique as a qualitative research method. AORN Journal, 74(4), 536-537.
Boreham, N. C., Shea, C. E., & Mackway-Jones, K. (2000). Clinical risk and collective competence in a hospital emergency department in the UK. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 83-91.
Bendtsen, P., Hensing, G., Ebeling, C., & Schedin, A. (1999). What are the qualities of dilemmas experienced when prescribing opioids in general practice? Pain, 82(1), 89-96.
Bendtsen, P., Hensing, G., McKenzie, L., & Stridsman, A. K. (1999). Prescribing Benzodiazepines: A critical incident study of a physician dilemma. Social Science and Medicine, 49(4), 459-467.
Bergamasco, E., Rossi, L., Amancio, A., & Carvalho, E. (2002). Body image of outpatients with burns sequellae: Evaluation through Critical Incident Technique. Burns, 28(1), 47-52.
Callan, R. J. (1998). The Critical Incident Technique in hospitality research: An illustration from the UK lodge sector. Tourism Management, 19(1), 93-98.
Callon, M., & Law, J. (1997). After the individual in society: Lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 22(2), 165-182.
Colnerud, G. (1997). Ethical conflicts in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(6), 627-635.
Connolly, M. (2001b). Child care and protection services in child welfare. In M. Connolly (Ed.), New Zealand social work: Contexts and practice (pp. 221-235). Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
Connolly, M. (2003). Qualitative analysis: A teaching tool for social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 2(1), 103-112.
Cowie, H., Naylor, P., Rivers, I., Smith, P., & Pereira, B. (2002). Measuring workplace bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(1), 33-51.
Everitt, A. (1998). Research and development in social work. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli & M. Payne (Eds.), Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
Ferguson, H. (2004). Protecting children in time: Child abuse, child protection and the consequences of modernity. Houndsmill, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Flanagan, J. (1954). The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-358.
Fook, J. (1996). The reflective researcher: Social workers' theories of practice research. St Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Foucault, M. (1972). Archeologie du savoir: The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
Gilgun, J. F., & Abrams, L. S. (2002). The nature and usefulness of qualitative social work research: Some thoughts and an invitation to dialogue. Qualitative Social Work, 1(1), 39-55.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hargreaves, K. (2002). Constructing families and kinship through donor insemination: Discourses, practices, relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Henwood, K. L., & Pidgeon, N. F. (1996). Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Social research: Philosophy, politics and practice. London: Sage.
Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2002). Inside knowledge: Issues in insider research. Nursing Standard, 16(46), 33-35.
Hilgartner, S. (1992). The social construction of risk objects: Or, how to pry open networks of risk. In J. F. Short & L. B. Clarke (Eds.), Organizations, uncertainties, and risk (pp. 39-53). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Kemppainen, J. K. (2000). The Critical Incident Technique and nursing care quality research. Journal of Applied Nursing, 32(5), 1264-1271.
Kiro, C. (2000). Maori research and the social sciences. Social Work Review, XII(4), 26-32.
Layder, D. (1993). New strategies in social research: An introduction and guide.
Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press
Latour, B. (1999a). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.
Latour, B. (1999b). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewin, E., & Leap, W. (1996). Out in the field: Reflections of lesbian and gay anthropologists. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
MacBride-Stewart, S. (2001). Health 'in Queer Street': Constituting sickness,
sexualities and bodies in the spaces of lesbian health. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
MacGibbon, L. (2002). Power, knowledge and reflexivity: Learning "from experience" in a women's refuge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Michell, A. P. J. (2004, March). The contours of the quantitative/qualitative distinction in psychological research methods. Paper presented at the Psychology seminar, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Parton, N. (1999). Reconfiguring child welfare practices: Risk, advanced liberalism and the government of freedom. In A. S. Chambon, A. Irving & L. Epstein (Eds.), Reading Foucault for social work (pp. 101-130). New York: Columbia University Press.
Pérez-y-Pérez, M. (2003). Discipline, autonomy and ambiguity: Organisations, markets and work in the sex industry, Christchurch, New Zealand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Plummer, K. (1995). Telling sexual stories: Power, change, and social worlds. London: Routledge.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Rodwell, M. K. (1998). Social work constructionist research. New York: Garland.
Sadique, D. (1996). Undertaking the challenge: Using qualitative methods to identify social work competencies. In J. Fook (Ed.), The reflective researcher: Social workers' theories of practice research (pp. 21-30). St Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text, and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Smith, C. (1998a). Beyond the tip of the iceberg. Social Work Now, 11, 33-40.
Smith, C. (2001). Research and the theory/ practice interface. In M. Connolly (Ed.), New Zealand social work: Contexts and practice (pp. 343-355). Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
Smith, C. (2001). Research and the theory/ practice interface. In M. Connolly (Ed.), New Zealand social work: Contexts and practice (pp. 343-355). Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
Southwick, M. (2001). Pasifikan social work theory. Social Work Review/ Tu Mau, XIII(3), 19-22.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures. London: Continuum.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tolich, M., & Davidson, C. (1999). Starting fieldwork: An introduction to qualitative research in New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
van Heugten, K. (2004). Violence: The personal and professional self. In M. Connolly (Ed.), Violence in society: New Zealand perspectives. Christchurch, New Zealand: Te Awatea Press.
Woolgar, S. (1991). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination. London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
