Environmental Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review on Green Innovation and Its Key Elements

Authors

  • Nur Aisya Addina Ahmad Bakarim Department of Postgraduate and Professional Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia
  • Ramita Abdul Rahim Department of Technology and Supply Chain Management Studies, Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia and Institute of Continuing Education & Professional Studies (iCEPS) Level 2, UiTM-MTDC Technopreneur Centre, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah Faculty of Business and Management (FBM), Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Puncak Alam, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.112.2.16400

Keywords:

Green Innovation, Green Innovation Practices, Organizations, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Green Innovation is rapidly becoming a critical business component for many organizations.  Thus, this study aims to examine Green Innovation practice research in the literature.  At the same time, this study stresses that the practice of implementing Green Innovation may be used by any firm.  A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method is utilized for this aim, with 42 out of 125 studies meeting the search criteria.  24 of those studies are concerned with Green Innovation.  Based on the findings of the investigations, five variables (green product innovation, green process innovation, green services innovation, green managerial innovation and green marketing innovation) have been highlighted as elements of Green Innovation for organizations.  Therefore, this article will serve as a useful guide for firms looking to implement greener technologies through the usage of Green Innovation.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-05

How to Cite

Bakarim, N. A. A. A., Abdul Rahim, R., & Hamzah, M. I. (2024). Environmental Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review on Green Innovation and Its Key Elements. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 11(2.2), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.112.2.16400

Most read articles by the same author(s)