Measuring the Performance of University Technology Transfer through the estimation of Invention Disclosure Life: Focus on Urban Marginal Area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.35.1525Abstract
With the growing competition in a globalized world, universities are seen as the key organizations and supporters in the national innovation system (Audretsch et al. 2006). Thus, national and regional policy makers try to set incentives for innovations and to increase the innovative potential of universities and to use it effectively. A large and diverse literature analyzes the importance of universities within the regional and national innovation system (Mowery and Sampat 2005; Cosh and Hughes 2010; Audretsch et al. 2011), often highlighting the necessity of separate and specialized organizational units to manage industry–university collaborations (Link et al. 2008; Fritsch and Lukas 2001). Within this process, TTO are seen as the institutionalized way to transport and canalize the ideas, inventions and innovations of academic researchers into the (regional) industry and society (van Ledebur 2008; Meoli et al. 2011; Gonzàles-Pernia et al. 2011). Thus, given the importance attached to TTO within this process, policy makers and university management should be interested in the performance differences of TTO.
During its activity, after a certain period, we can define as the “performance life”, continuing to try to transfer to the industry the same technologies leads to heavy financial loss to the TTO, because innovations and their commercialization, based on networking effects between the academic researchers and the industry, with TTO as the hub of the university–industry, determine market saturation.
In this article, we deal with estimation of “performance life” for the invention disclosures by TTO and determination of replacement plan. This “performance life” has been modeled using a piecewise linear-quadratic TTFR function. A computational procedure is proposed for estimation of performance life. Hülsbeck et al., (2011) used the number of invention disclosures as a performance measure, to analyze how variance in performance can be explained by different organizational structures and variables of TTO. In this paper we refer to the same performance measure to be monitored.
The approach of the present study declines the exposed issue to the specific case of marginal urban area. Results of an empirical analysis are proposed. It regards to a real case, based on the analysis of the impacts of the recent settlement of a research center, the center Cesma of the University of Naples Federico II, in marginal east area of the city of Naples, in which the local administration has decided to implement requalification actions. Finally, a technology transfer replacement plan for TTO is derived. This proposed model and solution may be appealing to geographers, managers and technology transfer agents since the graphs and tables proposed could be reproduced in a number of standard optimization software.
References
Agrawal, A., Henderson, R., (2002). Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48 (1), 44–60.
Anderson T., Daim T. , Lavoie F (2007). Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation, 27, 306-318.
Audretsch, D. B., Hulsbeck, M. & Lehmann E. E. (2011). Regional competitiveness, university spilloversand entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics.
Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. USA: Oxford University Press.
Baldini, N. (2006). University patenting and licensing activity: A review of the literature. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 197–207.
Basu, A. P., Ghosh, J. K., Joshi, S. N. (1988). On estimating change point in a failure rate. In: Gupta, S. S., Berger, J. O., eds. Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics IV. Vol. 2. Springer-Verlag, 239–252.
Beise, M., Stahl, H., (1999). Public research and industrial innovations in Germany. Research Policy, 28 (4), 397–422.
Bennet, J., Polkinghorne, M., Pearce, J., (1998). Quantifying the effectiveness of an academia-industry technology transfer initiative in a low prosperity region of the UK. Paper presented at the International Conference on Management of Technology.
Boyle, K., (1986). Technology transfer between universities and the UK offshore industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 33 (1), 33–42.
Carlsson, B., & Fridh, A.-C. (2002). Technology transfer in United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1–2), 199–232.
Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., (2005). Assessing the relative performance of U.K. university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, 34 (3), 369–384.
Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48 (1), 1–23.
Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R.R., Rosenberg, N., et al., (2002). How do university inventions get into practice? Management Science, 48 (1), 61–72.
Corsten, H., 1987. Technology transfer from universities to small and medium-sized enterprises—an empirical survey from the standpoint of such enterprises. Technovation 6 (1), 57–68.
Cosh, A., & Hughes, A. (2010). Never mind the quality feel the width: University–industry links andgovernment financial support for innovation in small high-technology businesses in the UK and the USA. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 66–91.
De Falco S. (2012) Is it possible to control and optimize technology transfer process? Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1:6.
De Falco S. (2014). Measuring the regional dimension of innovation through an economic model based on rectifying technology audits according to the AICTT-RTA protocol., Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Archives of Business Research ISSN 2054-7404.
di Gregorio, D., Shane, S., (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32 (2), 209–227.
Efron, B., Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall.
Feller, I., Ailes, C.P., Roessner, J.D., (2002). Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy, 31 (3), 457–474.
Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312.
Geuna, A., Nesta, L.J.J., 2006. University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35 (6), 790–807.
Goldfarb, B., Henrekson, M., (2003). Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32 (4), 639–658.
Goldhor, R.S., Lund, R.T., (1983). University-to-industry advanced technology transfer : a case study. Research Policy, 12 (3), 121–152.
Gombay, E. (2000). Sequential change-point detection with likelihood ratios. Statistics & Probability Letters 49:195–204.
Gonzàles-Pernia, J.L., Kuechle, G., & Pen˜aki-Legazkue I. (2011). An assessment of the determinants of university technology transfer. Economics of Innovation and New Technology.
Gṻrler, U ., Yenigṻn, C. D. Hazard Change-point Models with Truncated Data. Technical Report 2002–05, Department of Industrial Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey, 2002.
Heher, A., (2006). Return on investment in innovation: implications for institutions and national agencies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (4), 403–414.
Hülsbeck M., Lehmann E., Starnecker A., (2011). Performance of technology transfer offices in germany. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 199–215.
Jensen, R. A., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91(1), 240–259.
Kapur, K. C., Lamberson, L. R. (1977). Reliability in Engineering Design. John Wiley & Sons.
Lawless, J. F. (1982). Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data. John Wiley & Sons.
Lee, J., Win, H.N., 2004. Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation, 24 (5), 433–442.
Link, A., Rothaermel, F., & Siegel, D. (2008). University technology transfer: An introduction to the special issue. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 5–8.
Loader, C. R. (1991). Inference for a hazard rate change-point. Biometrika 78:749–757.
Lopez, W.H., 1998. How universities can organize to support industrially relevant research effectively. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 57 (3), 225–228.
Lopez-Martinez, R.E., Medeli, E., Scanl, P.A., Solerio, J.L., 1994. Motivations and obstacles to university industry cooperation: a Mexican case. R&D Management, 24 (1), 17–32.
Lowe, R., 2006. Who develops a university invention? The impact of tacit knowledge and licensing policies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (4), 415–429.
Manna, D.K. (2004), Estimation of Life with piecewise Linear-Quadratic Hazard rate, Quality Engineering vol. 16, N.4, pp. 577-584
Matthews, D. E., Farewell, V. T. (1982). On testing for a constant hazard against a change-point alternative. Biometrics 38:463–468.
Mazzoleni, R., 2006. The effects of university patenting and licensing on downstream R&D investment and social welfare. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31 (4), 431–441.
McAdam, R., Keogh, W., Galbraith, B., Laurie, D., (2005). Defining and improving technology transfer business and management processes in university innovation centres. Technovation, 25 (12), 1418–1429.
Meeker, W. Q., Escobar, L. A. (1998). Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. John Wiley & Sons.
Meoli, M., Paleari, S. & Vismara S. (2011). Completing the technology transfer process: The IPOs and M&As of biotech spin-offs, Small Business Economics.
Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U., (1998). Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27 (8), 835–851.
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university–industry technology transfer: A model for other OECD governments? Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1–2), 115–127.
Mowery, D.C., Sampat, B.N., Ziedonis, A.A., (2002). Learning to patent: institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of U.S. University Patents after the Bayh–Dole act, 1981–1992. Management Science, 48 (1), 73–89.
Nelson, W. (1982). Applied Life Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Nguyen, H. T., Rogers, G. S., Walker, E. A. (1984). Estimation in change-point hazard rate models. Biometrika 71:299–304.
Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., Powell, W.W., (2002). A comparison of U.S. and European university–industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science, 48 (1), 24–43.
Rasmussen, E., Moen, O., Gulbrandsen, M., (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26 (4), 518–533.
Rothaermel, F. T., Agung S. D., & Jiang L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, Advance Access published, July 18, 2007, 1–101.
Rukhin, A. L. (1997). Change-point estimation under asymmetric loss. Statistics & Decisions 15:141–163.
Sampat, B.N., 2006. Patenting and US academic research in the 20th century: the world before and after Bayh–Dole. Research Policy, 35 (6), 772–789.
Shane, S., 2002. Selling university technology: patterns from MIT. Management Science, 48 (1), 122–137.
Shane, S., Stuart, T., (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48 (1), 154–170.
Siegel, D.S., Thursby, J.G., Thursby, M.C., Ziedonis, A.A., (2004). Organizational issues in university–industry technology transfer: an overview of the symposium issue. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26 (1), 5–11.
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Link, A., (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy, 32 (1), 27–48.
Srinath, L. S. (1975). Concepts in Reliability. Affiliated East-West Press.
Thursby, J. G., & Thrusby, M. C. (2007). University licensing. Oxford.Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 620–639.
Thursby, J.G., Kemp, S., (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31 (1), 109–124.
Trune, D.R., Goslin, L.N., (1998). University technology transfer programs: a profit/loss analysis—A preliminary model to measure the economic impact of university licensing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 57 (3), 197–204.
Tseng, A. A., Raudensky, M. (2015). Performances of technology transfer activities of US universities after Bayh-Dole Act. J. Economics, Business & Management, 3(6), 661-667.
Van Ledebur, S. (2008). Technology transfer offices and university patenting—a review. Jena Economic Papers, 2008-033.
Vinig T. & Lips D. (2015) Measuring the performance of university technology transfer using meta data approach: the case of Dutch universities.Journal of Technology Transfer, open access.
Zucker, L.G., Darby, M.R., Armstrong, J.S., (2002). Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48 (1), 138–153.
