Governance in Universities: The Institutional Performance Measurement System (IPMS)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.64.4417Keywords:
University Governance, , Institutional Performance Measurement System.Abstract
The higher education sector continues to be influenced by the market, as well as the continued pressures of lower government funding, and the need of citizens for easy access to educational services, and even with increased competition from international institutions. All these are the factors that determine the success of higher education institutions, and force the institutions to adapt quickly in an environment that requires a steady stream of satisfying educational services..
Over the last decade, changes in funding and growing demands from students and donors have created a whole new model of higher education.This new trend has changed the way higher education institutions are run and operated, and the public's perception of them. Higher education institutions ,now, need to be managed more as public administrations or a business in the private sector. New models not largely dependent on public and government grants, but it is always based on accountability to the public and satisfy the needs of society. In some new model, higher education institutions must increasingly generate revenue, as does any private sector for profit corporation. Academics see universities as the engine of total progress. They transfer their intellectual productions to the institutions to meet the needs of society; University governance is making this progress. Here, University governance appears to be a necessary and precondition for deepening the independence of universities and institutions of higher education.
This research shows the principles of this governance, methodology, models, comparisons between countries, and proposes a new model.
References
- ASSIE .J-D, Renforcement de l’excellence universitaire, partenariat, relation avec les entreprises, AUF, 2006.
-AUF , Séminaire la gouvernance universitaire : résumé des travaux, 15-19/12 /2003.
- California public employees ,retirement’ system:Global Governance principles , California Public Employees’ Retirement System Lincoln Plaza 6- 400 Q Street - Sacramento, 2015,CA 95811 .
-CHEMS Consulting, A Final Report to the CUC on: Good practice in six Areas of the Governance of High Education Institutions, October 2004.
-Côme .Thierry, La Gouvernance des Universites, AIRMAP , « Gestion et management public » , 2013/3 ,Volume 2/n°1 | pages 1 à 5.
- Considine. Mark, The Enterprise University & New Governance Dynamics, The Public Management, Cambridge University Press .
- Cour des Comptes , efficience et efficacités des universités :observation récentes et nouvelles approches, rapport 2005, France .
- Deloite Canada , Higher education is evolving As the business model changes, the governance model must too. (2005 ) .www2.deloitte.com/ca/en/pages/human-capital/articles/higher-education-is-evolving.html.
- ERNST & YOUNG , Les établissements d’enseignement supérieur à l’heure du pilotage Les établissements d’enseignement supérieur à l’heure du pilotage,2015, ey.com/fr.
- Eurydice, La gouvernance de l'enseignement supérieur en Europe, Unité européenne, Bruxelles, , Unité européenne. 2008. www.eurydice.org.
- Harlam. Alan,& All , Putting Community First in Social Innovation Education Putting Community First in Social Innovation ,Stanford Social Innovation Review , Jan. 4, 2017.
- Jensen .William, Meckling. H , Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,Journal of Finaancial Economics ,Volume 3,Issue4,October 1976,pages 305-360, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
- Kaplan, R. S.& Norton. D.P, The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press ,2001.
- Larouche. Catherine & All , La mesure différenciée de la performance des établissements au collégial et à l’université: validation d’une typologie des conceptions de l’enseignement supérieur, 2012, Université de Laval, Université de Québec, CREE.
- Marie-Andrée Caron & Hugues Boisvert , Contrôle de gestion et gouvernance de l'université : la comptabilité comme ressource discursive de la performance, France. 36ème congrès de l'AFC, May 2015, Toulouse,France.
- Maher . Maria & Andersson. Thomas, Corporate Governance :effects on firm performance and economic growth,Organization for economic , 1999, OECD .
- Marccus Partners , The takeover Bids directive, Assessment Report, , Center for European Policy Studies, European Commission, Brussels ,2012 .
- Mayne . Eric , Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations with 2010 Amendments , 2nd Edition , ASX Corporate Governance Council , August 2007.
- Meri Mohamed meri , Système de mesure de la performance universitaire, modèle de tableau de bord équilibré, un projet de recherche en coopération entre l’université de Damas et L’université de Mohamed 5 Agdal , Bourse de AUF , décembre 2007 .
- MUSSELIN. C, régulation des systèmes universitaires : quelles leçons tirées de comparaison - France/ Allemagne/USA, 2001 .
- Musselin. Christine, La Grande course des universités, Business & Economics , 2017 .
- OCDE : Perspectives des politiques de l’éducation, Les réformes en marche: Les réformes en marche, OECD Publishing, Jan 19, 2015 - 356 pages.
-LA PORTA .I.R. & all , investor protection and corporate governance , truck school of business of Dartmouth, USA, 1999.
- Prost . Anne , La gouvernance des universités britanniques, département science et technologie , à partir du rapport de stage de Mlle Céline Compagnon, publié le 27/11/2007.
- ORY. Jean-Francis , Contrôle et pilotage de la performance globale des universités. Une approche par les parties prenantes : l’exemple du développement durable, l’Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, thèse 2015.
- Robert .M. Fabes & all , Toronto Stock Exchange ,Request for comments, Corporate Governance policy-proposed new disclosure, Requirement & Amended Guidelines ,1994,Toronto.Canada.
- TOULOUSE J-M : Rapport sur la gouvernance des institutions universitaires, HEC, monterial , 2007.
