Independence and Fraud Detection: Influence on The Professionalism of Forensic Auditor

Authors

  • Tries Ellia Sandari Economy Faculty of Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.69.5210

Keywords:

Audit risk, investigative auditing techniques, independence, fraud, detection of fraud, forensic auditors, professionalism

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of this study aimed to analyze the influence of audit risk, and investigative audit techniques, on independence, fraud detection and forensic auditor professionalism in Indonesia. This study uses a survey method conducted for all forensic auditors in Indonesia with 200 forensic auditors who have handled fraud cases. The number of samples used was 116 respondents. Data analysis and hypothesis in this study use Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with PLS 20.0 software. The results of this study indicate that twelve hypotheses were accepted. The significance of this hypothesis shows directly through audit risk, investigative audit techniques on independence, fraud detection and forensic auditor professionalism, so that the forensic auditor's professionalism in detecting fraud will increase.

References

A.A Putu Ratih Cahaya Ningsih dan P. Dyan Yaniartha, (2013),”Pengaruh Kompensasi, Independensi, dan time Budget Pressure terhadap Kualiatas Audit” E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 4.1: 92- 109

Andenna Pentaza Swastyami. (2016). “Karakteristik Auditor. Audit Risiko. dan tanggung jawab dalam mendeteks kecurangan”Journal Of Business Accounting. Vol. XV No. 29. 2016.

Arens, et.al. 2008. Auditing and Assurance Services, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1062534/kasus-korupsi-tahun-2017-icw-kerugian-negara-rp

https://news.detik.com/berita/d-3787260/kpk-kembalikan-rp-2766-miliar-uang-negara-di-2017

https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi/papers-antikorupsi/488-tantangan-governansi-dalam-menyelesaikan-masalah-korupsi-di-sektor-publik-sektor-swasta

Jaffar et.al.2008. The Effects of the External Auditors' Ability to Assess Fraud Risk on TheirAbility to Detect the Likelihood of Fraud. International Journal of Management Perspectives. ISSN: 1307-1629. 2008. 1 (1). 49-70.

Jan Svanberg. Peter Ohman. (2013). Time pressure Auditor: Does the quality of the audit support ethical culture. Managerial Auditing Journal. Journal of emerald Vol. 28 Iss: 7. pp.572 – 591

Krambia-Kapardis. M. 2002. A fraud detection model: a must for auditors, the Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 10 (3). 266-278.

Matsumura and Tucker. 1997. Fraud detection: A theoretical foundation. Fraud detection: A theoretical foundation, The AccountingReview, 67 (4), 753-782.

Suraida, Ida. (2012). “Pengaruh etika, kompetensi, Pengalaman, Risiko Audit dan Skeptisme Profesionalisme Auditor Terhadap Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Akuntan Publik” Vol. 7 No. 3.186 -202.

Tuanakotta, Theodorus M,(2012). Forensic Accounting and Investigative Audit. Jakarta's Salemba Empat.

Widiyastuti, Marcellina and Sugeng Pamudji,(2009). “Pengaruh Kemandirian, kompetensi, dan profesionalisme Menuju kemampuan Auditor dalam mendeteksi Kecurangan, Nilai tambah”. Vol. 5, no. 2

Wahono, Sugeng.2011. Audit Investigation. Narotama University. Surabaya

Downloads

Published

2018-10-01

How to Cite

Sandari, T. E. (2018). Independence and Fraud Detection: Influence on The Professionalism of Forensic Auditor. Archives of Business Research, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.69.5210